.22LR as a SELF DEFENSE ROUND??

Published on December 17, 2025
Duration: 1:23

This video from GUNBROS critically examines the suitability of the .22LR cartridge for self-defense, challenging common myths. The speaker, with high authority, explains that while .22LR is dangerous and widely available, it lacks the terminal performance and reliability needed for effective defensive encounters compared to larger calibers. The content emphasizes that 'dangerous' does not equate to 'sufficient' for self-defense scenarios.

Quick Summary

.22LR is dangerous and can cause harm, but experts from GUNBROS advise against relying on it for self-defense. While lightweight and easy to conceal, it lacks the terminal ballistics, penetration, and reliability needed for effective incapacitation compared to larger calibers. The myth of 'bouncing bullets' does not make it sufficient for defensive use.

Chapters

  1. 00:00The .22LR Defense Argument
  2. 00:22The Reality of .22LR for Defense
  3. 00:51Dangerous vs. Sufficient

Frequently Asked Questions

Is .22LR a good caliber for self-defense?

.22LR is considered dangerous and can cause harm, but it is generally not recommended as a primary self-defense round. Experts argue it lacks the necessary penetration, energy transfer, and reliability compared to larger calibers like 9mm or .45 ACP for effective defensive outcomes.

Why do people think .22LR is good for concealed carry?

.22LR is often considered for concealed carry because the cartridges are small and lightweight, making firearms chambered in this caliber easier to conceal. However, this convenience comes at the cost of significantly reduced defensive effectiveness.

What is the 'bouncing bullet' myth about .22LR?

The 'bouncing bullet' myth suggests that .22LR bullets fragment or ricochet unpredictably inside the body, causing more damage. Ballistically, this is not a reliable or sufficient mechanism for incapacitation, and larger calibers offer more predictable and effective wound channels.

What's the difference between 'dangerous' and 'sufficient' for self-defense?

'Dangerous' means a firearm or caliber can inflict harm, which .22LR certainly can. 'Sufficient' for self-defense implies it reliably incapacitates a threat with minimal risk of failure. Experts emphasize that while .22LR is dangerous, it often falls short of being sufficient compared to more robust defensive calibers.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from GUNBROS

View all →