Police Called On EDP, Chaos Ensues

Published on October 18, 2021
Duration: 13:35

This video analyzes a critical incident where police responded to a man with a known history of mental illness who was threatening family members with a knife. The analysis highlights the inherent dangers of responding to such calls, emphasizing that when 9-1-1 is called for a violent individual, law enforcement is dispatched with the authority to use lethal force. It underscores the importance of addressing mental health crises proactively before they escalate to a point requiring police intervention, and critiques the lack of less-lethal options for officers in this specific incident.

Quick Summary

When 9-1-1 is called for a violent individual, law enforcement is dispatched with the authority to use lethal force. Responding to individuals with known mental health issues who are actively violent and armed with weapons like knives presents extreme danger. The lack of less-lethal options for officers often forces reliance solely on firearms, increasing the risk of deadly outcomes.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Violent Family Member Calls
  2. 00:14Welcome & Sponsor Message
  3. 00:43Incident Overview: Threat with a Gun
  4. 01:02Initial Encounter: Commands to Drop Knife
  5. 03:43Aftermath: Officer Involved Shooting Analysis
  6. 03:59Mental Health Crisis: Call for Help
  7. 04:21Lesson 1: Calling 9-1-1 for Violence
  8. 05:03Police as Last Resort
  9. 05:16Subject's Actions: Advancing with Knife
  10. 05:32Lesson 2: Lack of Less Lethal Tools
  11. 05:59Officer Training & Equipment Critique
  12. 06:14Officer Approach & De-escalation
  13. 06:21Crisis Intervention vs. Emergency Commands
  14. 06:41Realistic De-escalation: Thinking, Feeling, Behaving
  15. 07:06The Most Dangerous Suspect Profile
  16. 07:13Suicide by Cop Analysis
  17. 07:38Officer Actions: Backing Away, Commands
  18. 07:56Family Intervention & Increased Danger
  19. 08:10The Moment of the Shooting
  20. 08:52Justification of Force
  21. 09:10Knife Size & Officer Actions
  22. 09:33Subject's Advance & Officer's Position
  23. 10:01Officer Using Environment for Spacing
  24. 10:18Bystanders & Limited Retreat Options
  25. 10:42Reasonable vs. Guaranteed Outcome
  26. 10:54Justified Use of Force
  27. 10:57Warning to Bystanders: Do Not Intervene
  28. 11:11Scene Chaos: Mom's Intervention
  29. 11:39Officer Compassion During Chaos
  30. 11:40Officer Safety & Crime Scene Management
  31. 12:10Emotional Aftermath & Perceived Injustice
  32. 12:33City Response: Crisis Trained Officers
  33. 12:41Intervention Specialist Limitations
  34. 12:50Cost-Effective Less Lethal Options
  35. 13:02Conclusion: Officers Acted Reasonably
  36. 13:12Systemic Failures: Training & Equipment
  37. 13:22Justification of Officer Actions
  38. 13:27Hope for Better Training & Equipment

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key takeaways from the Active Self Protection video about responding to a violent individual with a mental health crisis?

The video emphasizes that calling 9-1-1 for a violent person means expecting law enforcement to use force. It highlights the extreme danger of individuals with known mental illness who are actively threatening others with weapons like knives. The analysis also critiques the lack of less-lethal options for officers, forcing reliance on firearms.

Why is it dangerous to call 9-1-1 for a violent person with mental health issues?

When you call 9-1-1 for a violent individual, you are summoning state agents authorized to use violence. For individuals with known mental health issues who are actively violent and armed, the situation is extremely dangerous due to unpredictable behavior and the immediate threat posed by weapons like knives.

What tactical challenges did officers face in the Philadelphia incident?

Officers faced the challenge of a subject advancing with a knife within the critical 21-foot range. They also had to contend with bystanders, including family members, interfering with the scene. Critically, they were reportedly equipped only with firearms, lacking less-lethal options like tasers or pepper spray.

What is the significance of the subject having a known history of mental illness in this incident?

A known history of mental illness suggests the subject's thinking may be contaminated, making them less responsive to de-escalation. This, combined with violent and non-compliant behavior while armed, elevates the threat level significantly, indicating a high-risk encounter for responding officers.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from Active Self Protection

View all →