Reality of Deadly Force | The Hard Truths

Published on November 4, 2022
Duration: 2:46

This video from Geauga Firearms Academy discusses the critical considerations surrounding the use of deadly force. Instructor Kim emphasizes that deadly force should only be employed to prevent serious bodily harm or death to a person, even if state laws permit its use for property protection. The discussion highlights the three 'battles' involved: the physical, the financial/legal, and the often-overlooked emotional battle of taking a life. The video stresses that legal justification is assessed by a 'reasonable person' standard, and the aftermath involves extensive legal scrutiny.

Quick Summary

Deadly force should only be used to prevent serious bodily harm or death to a person, based on the 'reasonable person' standard. Geauga Firearms Academy highlights the three battles: physical, legal, and emotional. While some laws allow deadly force for property, it's ethically questionable and not worth the risk of severe consequences.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Deadly Force
  2. 00:06When Can You Use Deadly Force?
  3. 00:16The 'Reasonable Person' Standard
  4. 00:22Deadly Force for Property vs. Life
  5. 00:38Shark Tank Analogy
  6. 00:51The Three Battles: Physical, Legal, Emotional
  7. 01:14Assailant's Condition
  8. 01:23The Reality vs. Romanticized Thoughts
  9. 01:35Disconnect Between Breaking Law and Deadly Force
  10. 01:49Jury Composition
  11. 02:01Legal Scrutiny vs. Split-Second Decisions
  12. 02:15This Isn't the Movies
  13. 02:22Call to Action and Social Media

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary justification for using deadly force according to Geauga Firearms Academy?

According to Geauga Firearms Academy instructor Kim, deadly force should only be used to prevent serious bodily harm or death to a person. This principle is based on the 'reasonable person' standard, emphasizing the protection of human life above all else.

What are the three 'battles' involved when considering the use of deadly force?

The three battles are the physical confrontation itself, the subsequent financial and legal battle (including civil suits), and the often-overlooked emotional battle of having taken a life. This emotional aspect can be a significant long-term consequence.

Does state law allowing deadly force for property protection align with ethical considerations?

While some states may permit deadly force for property, the speaker argues it is not morally or ethically correct. The advice is to consider if the property is worth the risk of imprisonment, serious injury, or death, likening it to a dangerous gamble.

How is the justification for using deadly force assessed legally?

Legally, the use of deadly force is assessed by whether a 'reasonable person' would have acted the same way in the same situation. This standard is applied by judges and prosecutors who have extensive time to review the event, unlike the seconds available to the person acting.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from Geauga Firearms Academy

View all →