When she decided she wasn’t going to be a victim

Published on July 28, 2022
Duration: 1:01

This video explores the legal and tactical considerations of using deadly force, particularly in situations involving a disparity of force. Instructor Mike emphasizes that context is crucial when determining the legality of using a firearm against an unarmed assailant. A student's personal account highlights the necessity of employing lethal force to stop a threat when physical capabilities are outmatched.

Quick Summary

The legality of using deadly force against an unarmed person depends heavily on context, especially disparity of force. If an attacker's size or strength poses a severe threat that cannot be overcome physically, using a firearm to stop the threat may be legally justified.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Use of Force
  2. 00:10Disparity of Force Explained
  3. 00:38Case Study: Officer Assault

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an armed person legally use deadly force against an unarmed attacker?

Yes, under specific circumstances. The legality hinges on the context, particularly if there's a significant disparity of force, such as a large, strong attacker against a smaller defender, and the threat is imminent and severe enough to warrant deadly force to stop it.

What is disparity of force in self-defense?

Disparity of force refers to a significant difference in physical capabilities between an attacker and a defender. This can include size, strength, age, or the number of attackers, which may justify the defender using greater force, including deadly force, to neutralize the threat.

What is the primary goal when using a firearm for self-defense?

The primary goal when using a firearm for self-defense is to stop the immediate threat to your life or the lives of others. It's about neutralizing the danger effectively and decisively, not about inflicting injury or punishment.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from Instructor Mike

View all →