338 Lapua vs 300 Win Mag: CLOSER Than You Think On Mild Steel

This video provides an expert-level breakdown of the best ammunition cartridges for a SHTF (Shit Hits The Fan) scenario, prioritizing self-defense, food harvesting, and penetration capabilities. The instructor, with significant experience in ballistics testing, details recommendations from .22 LR for small game to .50 BMG for extreme threats, emphasizing availability, cost, and performance against various barriers. The content is geared towards individuals preparing for societal disruptions, offering practical advice on building a resilient ammunition stockpile.

This demonstration showcases the capabilities of the Hotchkiss Mle 1934 25mm Anti-Tank Gun. The video details its transport, setup, loading, firing, and the resulting penetration of a 1-inch steel plate, highlighting its anti-armor potential.

This video from Mr. Madness conducts a penetration test comparing 10mm, .357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, and 12 Gauge calibers for bear defense. It includes velocity measurements using a Garmin Xero C1 Pro and tests against ballistic media and a Level IV ceramic plate. The presenter emphasizes bear spray as a primary defense.

This video provides an expert-level ballistics comparison between the 6.5 Grendel and 50 Beowulf calibers, utilizing a LabRadar for precise velocity and kinetic energy measurements at 100 yards. The analysis highlights the 6.5 Grendel's superior aerodynamic efficiency and energy retention beyond 100 yards, despite the 50 Beowulf's higher initial energy. The instructor's use of empirical data and detailed analysis demonstrates high authority in ballistics testing.

This video provides a detailed comparison of several 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition types used by the US Navy, focusing on their terminal ballistics and penetration capabilities. The Mark 255 Mod 1, featuring a compressed copper polymer core, is highlighted for its rapid fragmentation and potential for large wound channels, while the M855A1 is noted for its extreme penetration. The M855 Green Tip and Mark 262 Mod 1 are also tested for comparison.

This video tests the bullet resistance of a Soviet-era hammer against various calibers of ammunition, from birdshot to .50 BMG. The hammer's head showed minimal damage from smaller calibers, with paint chips and small craters, but was significantly penetrated and damaged by larger rounds like 7.62x39mm and .308 Winchester.

This video provides an expert-level comparison between the .44 Magnum and .50 Action Express calibers, featuring a Magnum Research Desert Eagle and a Ruger Super Redhawk. The host, demonstrating high authority, conducts a series of tests including penetration through lumber, steel, sand, and concrete, followed by ballistic gel testing with hollow-point rounds. The analysis highlights differences in muzzle energy, penetration, and wound channel, ultimately questioning the cost-to-performance ratio of the .50 AE.

This video provides an in-depth, experimental comparison between .223 Remington and 5.56x45mm NATO cartridges, utilizing a chronograph and various barrier materials. The host, demonstrating high expertise through empirical testing, reveals significant performance differences, particularly in barrier penetration, with 5.56x45mm NATO generally outperforming .223 Remington.

This video from Banana Ballistics explores the surprising lethality of "less lethal" shotgun ammunition. Through rigorous testing with ballistic gel and plywood, the host demonstrates that rounds like bean bags and high-velocity .410 rubber buckshot can cause significant damage, challenging the common perception of these rounds as entirely non-lethal. The testing highlights the importance of understanding ammunition performance beyond its intended classification.

This video provides an objective comparison of 9mm Luger, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP calibers through a series of rigorous tests including lumber, sand, concrete, and ballistics gel. The host, leveraging specialized equipment like a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph and digital calipers, presents data on velocity, penetration, and expansion. While .40 S&W showed competitive performance in some tests, the analysis concludes with a preference for 9mm due to its higher capacity and lower recoil, highlighting the importance of practical considerations beyond raw ballistics.