AR500 Armor Test

Published on May 21, 2014
Duration: 21:49

This AR500 Armor test demonstrates the effectiveness of Level III steel plates against various handgun and rifle threats, including .30-06 AP and 5.56 M855. The proprietary Line-X anti-spalling coating successfully contains fragments, though it shows signs of delamination after extreme punishment. While the steel core remains intact, the test highlights that body armor offers a second chance, not invincibility, emphasizing the continued importance of tactics and situational awareness.

Quick Summary

AR500 Armor Level III steel plates effectively stop handgun rounds (9mm, .357 Mag, .44 Mag) and rifle threats (.30-06 AP, 7.62x51, 5.56 M855). The Line-X anti-spalling coating contains fragments, though it may delaminate under extreme stress. Steel offers better multi-hit capability than ceramic.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to AR500 Body Armor
  2. 02:02AR500 Plate Technical Features & Coating
  3. 03:51Armor Ratings & Testing Setup
  4. 04:41Historical vs. Modern Armor Comparison
  5. 07:08Handgun Threat Testing (9mm, .357, .44 Mag)
  6. 09:46Rifle Threat Testing (.30-06 AP, 7.62x51, 5.56 M855)
  7. 11:58Multi-Hit Durability & Spall Check
  8. 13:01Extreme Testing (.500 S&W) & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What threats can AR500 Armor Level III steel plates stop?

AR500 Armor Level III steel plates are tested to stop various handgun rounds like 9mm NATO, .357 Magnum, and .44 Magnum. They also successfully stopped high-velocity rifle threats including .30-06 M2 AP, 7.62x51mm NATO, and 5.56mm M855 'Green Tip'.

What is the purpose of the Line-X coating on AR500 Armor plates?

The proprietary Line-X (Paxcon) coating on AR500 Armor plates is designed for anti-spalling. Its primary function is to capture bullet fragments upon impact, preventing them from ricocheting and potentially injuring the wearer.

How does AR500 steel armor compare to ceramic armor in terms of durability?

Steel plates, like those made from AR500, generally offer superior multi-hit capability compared to ceramic plates. Ceramic plates tend to shatter or crack after a few impacts, compromising their integrity, whereas steel plates maintain their core structure longer.

Is body armor a substitute for tactical training and awareness?

No, body armor is not a substitute for proper tactics and situational awareness. The hosts emphasize that armor provides a 'second chance' but does not make the wearer invincible. Continuous training remains essential for personal safety.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →