Como eu comemoro o Ano Novo!

This video demonstrates the use of a 37mm grenade launcher for New Year's celebrations, specifically highlighting two Ordinance Group shells: the 'Whistling Pig' and the 'Freedom Round'. The presenter emphasizes their use for animal control to deter wildlife from crops, not as fireworks. The video also briefly mentions Ammo Squared for regular ammunition reloading.

This video tests the effectiveness of microscopic rubber ducks as 37mm riot control rounds fired from a TAC 79 grenade launcher. While the ducks demonstrated a wide spread pattern suitable for crowd dispersal, they lacked the energy to penetrate ballistics gelatin or significantly impact a water jug, indicating limited effectiveness for riot control purposes. The testing involved paper targets for spread, a water jug for energy, and ballistics gelatin heads as 'rioters'.

This video showcases three types of 37mm rounds for a grenade launcher, presented by a firearms enthusiast. It highlights the "Freedom Round" (blue), a "Crackle Round" (pink), and the "Whistle Pig" round (yellow), emphasizing their use for deterring wild pigs. The presenter also mentions the M Squared for ammunition organization and suggests reloading options.

This video demonstrates a test of 37mm skittle grenades as less-lethal ammunition for crowd control. Initial tests showed insufficient energy, but adjustments led to effective dispersion and impact. The projectiles were assessed for their ability to deter without causing lethal injury, with impacts on ballistic gel and a water jug analyzed.

This video compares three types of smoke devices: a hand-activated smoke grenade (TLSFX SP90), a grenade-launched smoke munition (Ordnance Group via TAC 79), and an emergency smoke signal. The TLSFX SP90 is highlighted for its rapid, dense white smoke output, effectively obscuring a large area quickly. The grenade-launched option provides good coverage but less volume than the SP90. The emergency signal produces a longer-lasting, but less dense, orange smoke. The SP90 is deemed most effective for immediate, dense visual cover.

This video details a dangerous experiment where a 37mm smoke grenade from Ordnance Group is heated in a frying pan. The experiment, conducted by Tática Civil, shows the grenade launching, emitting significant yellow smoke, and leaving melted plastic residue. The instructor emphasizes that this should never be replicated, highlighting the inherent risks associated with heating pyrotechnic devices.

This video explores the compatibility of a 50 BMG cartridge with a 12 gauge flare gun. The experiment reveals that while the cartridge fits, the flare gun's mechanism cannot ignite the tough 50 BMG primers. However, it successfully fires a standard 12 gauge blank, highlighting the difference in primer hardness. The content is presented from a hobbyist perspective, focusing on experimental curiosity rather than professional instruction.

This video from Tática Civil, featuring an expert instructor, explains the dangers of firing upwards due to projectile drop and terminal velocity. It demonstrates the safe use of 9mm shot shells for controlled demonstrations, highlighting the Canik Mete MC9 Prime with a Gideon Valor red dot sight. The instructor emphasizes crucial firearm safety protocols.

This guide details an experimental test to debunk the myth that a .50 BMG round passing near a target can be lethal. Using a ballistic mannequin, cardboard indicators, and a concrete backstop, the test demonstrates that a near miss from a .50 BMG round does not impart enough shockwave or air pressure to cause fatal injury, though the projectile itself possesses immense kinetic energy as evidenced by its impact on the concrete block. The test was conducted objectively by an individual with high authority, indicated by their empirical testing methods and proper safety protocols.

This video demonstrates a dramatic comparison between the .22 LR and .50 BMG calibers using a ballistic head model. The .50 BMG, when attached to an AR-15 platform via a Raptor upper, shows vastly superior destructive power, completely obliterating the model, while the .22 LR causes only superficial damage. The host's enthusiastic and experimental approach, combined with clear technical explanations, highlights the significant energy difference between these two rounds.