MK319 Reduced Velocity Gel Test - How does it compare to the Army's M80A1?

Published on April 2, 2018
Duration: 4:32

This video tests the MK319 ammunition at reduced velocity, comparing its performance in gelatin to the Army's M80A1. The MK319 demonstrated rapid upset and fragmentation, creating a significant temporary stretch cavity despite its lower velocity. While it did not penetrate as deeply as some other rounds, its tissue damage potential was noted as impressive.

Quick Summary

The MK319 ammunition was tested at reduced velocity by loading it into a 300 Blackout case and firing it from an 8-inch barreled AR-15 into calibrated gelatin. The results showed rapid upset and fragmentation, creating a large temporary stretch cavity, indicating impressive tissue damage potential comparable to the M80A1 in this scenario.

Chapters

  1. 00:02Introduction: MK319 vs M80A1
  2. 00:10Testing MK319 Reduced Velocity
  3. 00:22Setup: 300 Blackout, 8-inch Upper
  4. 00:54First Gel Test Results
  5. 01:19Penetration and Projectile Behavior
  6. 01:52Second Gel Test
  7. 02:05Second Test Observations
  8. 02:27Temporary Cavity Measurements
  9. 02:44Performance Analysis
  10. 03:06Comparison to M80A1 and M855A1
  11. 03:22Impressive Cavity at Reduced Velocity
  12. 03:28Handloader Considerations
  13. 03:32Army vs. Navy Ammunition Performance
  14. 03:51Conclusion: Tissue Performance
  15. 04:00Viewer Feedback and Future Tests

Frequently Asked Questions

How was the MK319 ammunition tested in this video?

The MK319 projectile was loaded into a 300 Blackout case and fired from an AR-15 with an 8-inch upper receiver into 10% calibrated gelatin at reduced velocity.

What were the key performance characteristics of the MK319 at reduced velocity?

The MK319 demonstrated rapid upset and fragmentation, creating a significant temporary stretch cavity in the gelatin. While penetration was substantial, it did not retain its core in all tests.

How does the MK319 compare to the Army's M80A1 in this reduced velocity test?

Both rounds performed impressively in tissue at reduced velocity. The MK319 showed good fragmentation and cavity effects, while the M80A1 might offer better barrier penetration, according to the presenter.

Is the MK319 suitable for handloaders?

Yes, the presenter suggests that handloaders might find the MK319 bullets to be a good option for 300 Blackout due to their performance at reduced velocities.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from ARFCOM News

View all →