Poor Man's ACOG? Trijicon TA44 vs Primary Arms Cyclops Torture Test

Published on July 12, 2019
Duration: 9:42

This comprehensive comparison and torture test evaluates the Trijicon TA44 ACOG against the Primary Arms Cyclops, positioning the Cyclops as a budget-friendly alternative. Both optics demonstrate exceptional durability through rigorous testing, including drops, submersion, and extreme temperatures. While the ACOG excels in outdoor illumination with its fiber optic system and offers higher magnification, the Cyclops provides a wider field of view and better performance with weapon lights indoors. The review highlights key differences in reticle design, illumination, size, weight, and turret adjustments, concluding that both are robust options, with the Cyclops being a strong contender for those seeking an affordable, tough prismatic sight.

Quick Summary

The Trijicon TA44 ACOG and Primary Arms Cyclops both passed extreme torture tests, proving their durability. The ACOG excels outdoors with fiber optic illumination, while the Cyclops is better indoors with weapon lights. Both are great for astigmatism, with the Cyclops being a much more affordable option at $240 versus the ACOG's $820.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Introduction & Comparison Premise
  2. 00:38Trijicon ACOG Reputation
  3. 01:07Torture Test Introduction
  4. 01:13Light Drop Test
  5. 01:18Hard Drop Test
  6. 01:27Water Submersion Test
  7. 01:31Dryer Test
  8. 01:44Freeze & Explosive Test
  9. 02:14Torture Test Results
  10. 02:20Shooting Experience & General Features
  11. 03:13Magnification Differences
  12. 03:29Reticle Differences
  13. 04:06Illumination Differences
  14. 04:20Outdoor Illumination Performance
  15. 04:55Indoor/Weapon Light Illumination Performance
  16. 05:29Suggested ACOG Illumination Improvement
  17. 05:50Accuracy Comparison
  18. 06:28Confidence vs. Measured Accuracy
  19. 06:53Size & Weight
  20. 07:07Turrets & Durability of Accessories
  21. 07:40Turret Adjustment Mechanism
  22. 08:14Conclusion & Recommendations

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the Trijicon TA44 ACOG compare to the Primary Arms Cyclops in terms of durability?

Both the Trijicon TA44 ACOG and the Primary Arms Cyclops demonstrated exceptional durability in rigorous torture tests, including drops, water submersion, and extreme temperature exposure. Both optics maintained their zero and functionality throughout the abuse, proving their toughness.

What are the key differences in illumination between the Trijicon TA44 ACOG and the Primary Arms Cyclops?

The Trijicon TA44 ACOG uses fiber optic and tritium for illumination, excelling in outdoor daylight brightness. The Primary Arms Cyclops is battery-powered, offering better performance with weapon lights indoors and behaving more like a red dot sight in those conditions.

Which optic is better for users with astigmatism, the ACOG or the Cyclops?

Both the Trijicon TA44 ACOG and the Primary Arms Cyclops are excellent choices for users with astigmatism. Their etched prismatic reticles provide a clear, crisp sight picture without the distortion often experienced with red dot sights.

What is the price difference between the Trijicon TA44 ACOG and the Primary Arms Cyclops?

The Primary Arms Cyclops is significantly more affordable, costing $240, while the Trijicon TA44 ACOG is priced at $820. This makes the Cyclops a compelling budget-friendly option for those seeking a durable prismatic optic.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from ARFCOM News

View all →