Shooting The Worlds LONGEST Silencers!!! But Do They Work???

Published on November 1, 2022
Duration: 22:54

This guide outlines the experimental process of testing extremely long, modular suppressors, as demonstrated by Matt Carriker of Demolition Ranch. It covers incremental testing, safety precautions for experimental setups, and inspection for damage like baffle strikes. The video highlights the performance differences between a .22 LR and a 9mm modular suppressor when configured to maximum length.

Quick Summary

Testing extremely long modular suppressors like the Q Erector 9 and 22 involves risks such as 'droop' and baffle strikes. While the .22 LR Erector 22 showed significant damage and accuracy loss at maximum length, the 9mm Erector 9 proved more robust, maintaining better performance and durability, highlighting differences in design and caliber handling.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro Skit & Topic Introduction
  2. 01:22Introducing Long Suppressors
  3. 02:00Q Erector Suppressors Overview
  4. 03:24Technical Concerns: Droop & Baffle Strikes
  5. 04:44Testing the Erector 22
  6. 09:21Full Length Erector 22 Test
  7. 10:40Erector 22 Damage Inspection
  8. 12:09Testing the Erector 9
  9. 17:26Full Length Erector 9 Test
  10. 19:53Subsonic 9mm Testing
  11. 20:26Final Inspection & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

How do modular suppressors like the Q Erector 9 and 22 perform when assembled to their maximum length?

When fully assembled to maximum length (69 sections), the Q Erector 22 experienced significant accuracy issues and internal damage due to baffle strikes. The Q Erector 9, however, remained more rigid, performed better, and showed minimal damage, indicating greater robustness in its extended configuration.

What are the main risks associated with testing extremely long suppressors?

The primary risks include 'droop,' where the suppressor's weight causes it to sag, leading to baffle strikes. Baffle strikes can damage the suppressor, the firearm's barrel, and potentially cause dangerous projectile deviations. Safety precautions like ballistic shields and remote firing are crucial.

What damage was observed on the Q Erector 22 after testing?

Upon disassembly, the Q Erector 22 revealed extensive damage, including lead fragments and deformed metal on the baffles. This indicated that the projectile repeatedly struck the internal components, a common issue with overly long or misaligned suppressor setups.

How does the Q Erector 9 compare to the Q Erector 22 in terms of durability when fully extended?

The Q Erector 9 demonstrated superior durability compared to the Q Erector 22 when both were assembled to their maximum length. While the .22 suppressor suffered severe baffle strikes, the 9mm version held up much better, functioning well with minimal signs of internal damage.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from DemolitionRanch

View all →