The direct mount gang is out in force

Published on August 26, 2024
Duration: 16:16

This video discusses the failure of a Holosun 507 Comp optic mounted via a CH Precision plate on a firearm. The speaker, Ben Stoeger, addresses viewer comments about optic mounting solutions, plate quality, and screw integrity. He shares his personal experience with CH Precision products, noting this is his first issue despite extensive use, and contrasts it with other mounting systems and brands like Radian and Forward Controls Design. The discussion highlights the importance of proper installation, screw quality, and the potential for optic failures after high round counts.

Quick Summary

A Holosun 507 Comp optic detached from a firearm after approximately 50,000 rounds due to mounting plate or screw failure. This incident sparks discussion on optic mounting solutions, screw quality, and maintenance, with alternatives like Radian and FCD plates being suggested.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Optic Failure & Viewer Comments
  2. 00:18The Direct Mount Gang & Plate Alternatives
  3. 00:31New Plates from Arisaka & Joel's Opinion
  4. 00:53Personal Experience with CH Precision Plates
  5. 01:11Comparing 507 Comp to SRO & Other Optics
  6. 01:34Radian Plates & MOS Guardian Plates
  7. 01:54GBRS on Shooting Without a Red Dot
  8. 02:01Screw Quality vs. Round Count: The Debate
  9. 02:19Safety Concerns & Treating All Guns as Loaded
  10. 02:42Aftermarket Glock Screws & MOS System Issues
  11. 02:57Hollow Sun Hardware & Battle Werx Screws
  12. 03:11Commentary: 'No Longer Burdened by What Has Been'
  13. 03:20Direct Mill vs. Plate Mounting
  14. 03:45CH Precision QC Issues & Iron Sight Zealots
  15. 04:06CH Plate Failure & Competition Impact
  16. 04:25Why Run an Acro: Mounting Style Advantage
  17. 04:56Speaker's Opposite Conclusion: High Round Count, Few Issues
  18. 05:20Crazy Emails & Wild Opinions on Maintenance
  19. 05:48Screw Retightening Frequency Debate
  20. 06:03Backup Guns & Other Mounting Solutions
  21. 06:08Lock Tight, Torque, Witness Marks & Inspection
  22. 06:34Skepticism on Maintenance Necessity
  23. 06:54SCS MOS Screw Head Shearing & Bad Batches
  24. 07:01Arisaka Plates & Holosun Shrouds
  25. 07:19Arisaka Shroud Durability Test (Sage Dynamics)
  26. 07:38Request for Plate and Screw Source
  27. 07:57CH Plate & Screws Confirmed; Hollow Sun Screw Doubt
  28. 08:03Forward Controls Plate & Holosun Screw Issues
  29. 08:12Over-Torquing Tiny Screws & Torque Wrenches
  30. 08:30Diagnosing Zero Loss: The Windage Screw
  31. 08:45Optic Detachment Scenario & Screw Breakage
  32. 09:01Similar PDP/507 Comp Failure with C&H Plate
  33. 09:21Round Count vs. Optic Usage Clarification
  34. 09:54Conclusion: Equipment Failure & Viewer Engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Holosun 507 Comp optic detach from the firearm?

The Holosun 507 Comp optic detached from the firearm after approximately 50,000 rounds due to a failure in the mounting plate and/or screws. This highlights potential issues with component integrity under high round counts or improper installation.

What are common alternatives to CH Precision mounting plates?

Commenters and the speaker mention Radian, Forward Controls Design (FCD), and Arisaka as manufacturers of alternative optic mounting plates. These are often suggested as potentially higher quality or more reliable options.

What is the recommended maintenance for optic mounting screws?

While some recommend using lock tight, proper torque, and witness marks with a paint marker for periodic inspection, the speaker expresses skepticism about the necessity of such frequent maintenance, citing his own extensive use with minimal issues.

Are Glock MOS systems reliable for mounting optics?

The Glock MOS system is generally viewed by some as having historically poor quality mounting solutions. Many users opt for aftermarket plates or direct milling to ensure a more secure optic attachment.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →