Why Revolvers are NOT GOOD For Appendix Carry!

Published on July 2, 2024
Duration: 8:05

This video explains why revolvers are generally not ideal for appendix carry due to their thickness and non-uniform dimensions, which can lead to discomfort and holster fit issues. It compares a Glock 19 to a Smith & Wesson 686, highlighting how barrel and trigger reach dimensions contribute to a longer overall profile for revolvers. The KPA Rhino 200DS is presented as a potential exception due to its unique design.

Quick Summary

Revolvers are generally not ideal for appendix carry due to their significant thickness (often 50% more than semi-autos) and non-uniform dimensions, which can cause discomfort and holster fit issues. Their trigger reach can also extend the gun's profile below the belt line, leading to poking sensations. The KPA Rhino 200DS is noted as a potential exception.

Chapters

  1. 00:10Introduction to Appendix Carry Concerns
  2. 00:30Revolvers for Appendix Carry? The Question
  3. 00:48Why Revolvers Are Awful for Appendix Carry
  4. 01:00Thickness and Non-Uniformity Issues
  5. 01:43Dimension Comparison: Glock 19 vs. S&W 686
  6. 02:06Barrel Length and Chamber Measurement Differences
  7. 03:14Trigger Reach and Overall Length Impact
  8. 04:06Pivot Point and Comfort Below Belt Line
  9. 04:33Manual Safety Preference for Appendix Carry
  10. 04:51Snub-Nose Revolvers for Appendix Carry?
  11. 05:31The KPA Rhino 200DS Exception
  12. 06:01Rhino's Uniform Thickness and Design
  13. 06:25Conclusion: Revolvers and Appendix Carry

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are revolvers generally not recommended for appendix carry?

Revolvers are typically thicker than semi-automatic pistols, often by 50%, and have non-uniform dimensions due to the cylinder. This thickness and shape can make them uncomfortable and difficult to conceal effectively when carried in the appendix position.

How do barrel and trigger dimensions affect appendix carry comfort with revolvers?

Revolvers can have a longer overall profile below the belt line due to their trigger reach and how the barrel/cylinder assembly is measured. This extra length can lead to discomfort and 'poking' sensations, especially when compared to more compact semi-automatic designs.

Is there any revolver that is considered good for appendix carry?

The KPA Rhino 200DS is mentioned as a potential exception. Its unique design places the trigger closer to the cylinder's front and features a flattened cylinder, resulting in a more uniform thickness and a potentially more comfortable appendix carry experience.

Do snub-nose revolvers offer an advantage for appendix carry?

While snub-nose revolvers are smaller, their fundamental design with a cylinder still makes them thicker and potentially longer in profile below the belt line than many semi-automatic options. The barrel length reduction doesn't fully negate the inherent bulk.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →