Why The US Army REALLY Said NO To Glock!

Published on December 17, 2022
Duration: 8:04

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM17 Modular Handgun System trials primarily because it was not a true modular handgun system as required. While Glock offered a configuration that mimicked modularity by combining different slide and grip sizes, it necessitated purchasing multiple pistols. Sig Sauer's P320, with its removable trigger package, met the modularity requirement more effectively, allowing for configuration changes with additional components at a lower overall cost per soldier.

Quick Summary

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM17 trials primarily because it failed to meet the core requirement of being a true modular handgun system. While Glock offered configurations by combining different slides and grips, it necessitated purchasing multiple pistols. Sig Sauer's P320, with its removable trigger package, provided genuine modularity, allowing for various configurations with additional components at a significantly lower overall cost per soldier.

Chapters

  1. 00:09XM17 Trials & Glock 19X Submission
  2. 00:42XM17 Requirements Overview
  3. 01:16Performance & Reliability Demands
  4. 01:46The Thumb Safety Factor
  5. 02:36Procurement Volume & Cost
  6. 03:01Modularity: The Core Issue
  7. 03:36Glock's Approach to Modularity
  8. 04:02Glock's System vs. Sig P320
  9. 04:19Cost Comparison: Sig vs. Glock
  10. 05:30Army's Assessment: Good vs. Acceptable
  11. 05:43Conclusion: Why Glock Was Turned Down

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the primary reasons the US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM17 trials?

The main reasons were that the Glock 19X was not a true modular handgun system as required, and its cost-effectiveness for achieving multiple configurations was lower than competing systems like the Sig P320.

How did the Sig P320 meet the US Army's modularity requirement for the XM17 trials?

The Sig P320's design features a removable trigger package, allowing users to swap grip modules and slide assemblies to create different handgun sizes, fulfilling the requirement for a single platform to adapt to various configurations.

What was the cost difference between the Sig P320 and Glock 19X for the US Army's procurement?

The Sig P320 system was estimated to cost around $1100 per soldier for three configurations, while the Glock 19X, requiring multiple pistol purchases, would have cost approximately $1800 per soldier.

Did the US Army require a thumb safety for the XM17 Modular Handgun System?

Yes, a thumb safety was a requirement for the XM17 trials. While Glock offered a 19X with a thumb safety, it added to the overall cost of their submission.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →