FBI Testing Needs A Makeover

Published on March 29, 2026
Duration: 16:00

This video critically examines the FBI's ballistic testing standards, highlighting areas for improvement. The presenter, Boondock, suggests that while the FBI sets a high bar, certain aspects like clothing simulation and steel barrier material consistency could be more realistic. The discussion also touches upon the nuances of over/under penetration, fragmentation versus expansion, and the importance of testing rounds based on their intended application and range, drawing parallels with military testing methodologies.

Quick Summary

The FBI's ballistic testing standards are widely recognized but face criticism for unrealistic clothing simulations, steel variability, and fixed glass angles. Unlike the FBI's standardized approach, military testing tailors criteria to projectile use cases and evaluates performance at realistic engagement ranges, considering factors like barrier penetration and lethality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main criticisms of FBI ballistic testing standards?

Criticisms include the unrealistic simulation of modern clothing materials, the variability in steel barrier performance due to manufacturing differences, and the fixed angles used for automotive glass testing which may not reflect real-world scenarios. The speaker also notes that all rounds are tested to the same criteria regardless of application.

How does military ballistic testing differ from FBI testing?

Military testing is more tailored to the intended use case of a projectile, evaluating rounds for specific roles like barrier penetration or lethality. It also emphasizes testing accuracy and terminal performance at more realistic engagement ranges, unlike the FBI's close-range gel tests.

Why is the material of steel barriers important in ballistic testing?

The manufacturing process of steel, even when specified to the same gauge and type (e.g., 20-gauge cold-rolled annealed steel), can significantly impact its grain structure and hardness. This variation can lead to inconsistent penetration results, making it difficult to compare tests reliably.

What are the key metrics the FBI uses in ballistic testing besides penetration depth?

Beyond penetration depth, the FBI heavily considers weight retention on the projectile and its expansion diameter. These metrics can sometimes penalize fragmenting rounds, which may be advantageous in certain applications like military engagements.

More Training & Techniques Videos You Might Like

More from Boondock Ballistician

View all →