“Size Does Matter” - Fudd University of Handgun Selection

Published on July 16, 2025
Duration: 10:09

This video argues against the 'bigger is better' mentality for handgun calibers, emphasizing that more bullets and faster follow-up shots are crucial for effectiveness in self-defense and duty scenarios. The speaker, identifying as an 'average big bore handguns do in fact suck video enjoyer,' draws on personal experience and observations to debunk common myths surrounding calibers like .44 Magnum, 10mm, and .45 ACP, advocating for 9mm as the superior choice due to its balance of capacity, controllability, and effectiveness when paired with quality ammunition.

Quick Summary

For concealed carry, duty use, and military applications, 9mm is recommended over larger calibers like .40 S&W, .357 SIG, 10mm Auto, and .45 ACP due to its superior capacity, manageable recoil allowing for faster follow-up shots, and proven effectiveness with modern ammunition.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: The 'Big Bore' Myth
  2. 01:05FUD Stories & Buddy Purchases
  3. 02:01Why More Bullets Matter
  4. 02:40Alaska Bear Country Experience
  5. 03:5110mm Auto: A Step Too Far?
  6. 04:54Ditching the Glock 20
  7. 05:59The Cycle: From Big Bore to 9mm
  8. 06:07Duty Use: Controllability & Accuracy
  9. 07:14Bigger Hole vs. More Shots
  10. 07:48Concealed Carry: Capacity is Key
  11. 08:13Gunfight Statistics Misinterpretation
  12. 08:50Summary: The 9mm Advantage
  13. 09:10Avoid FUD Lore
  14. 09:43Support the Channel

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is 9mm considered superior to larger handgun calibers for self-defense and duty use?

9mm is favored for its balance of manageable recoil, allowing for faster and more accurate follow-up shots, and higher magazine capacity. This combination is more critical for incapacitating a threat than the larger diameter of rounds like .45 ACP or 10mm, which often come with reduced capacity and increased recoil.

What is the primary argument against using large caliber handguns like .44 Magnum or 10mm for bear defense?

The argument against large caliber handguns for bear defense, as presented in the video, is that even these powerful rounds are unlikely to stop a charging grizzly without a precise hit to the brain or heart. The focus shifts to the importance of shot placement and the potential unreliability or reduced capacity of these firearms compared to a more practical defensive tool.

How does the speaker address the idea that a bigger hole from a larger caliber bullet is always better?

The speaker argues that while a bigger hole is technically true, it's not the most critical factor for handgun effectiveness. The ability to deliver multiple accurate shots quickly is paramount. A larger caliber that hinders follow-up shots or reduces capacity can be less effective than a 9mm that allows for more hits on vital areas.

What common misconceptions about handgun effectiveness does this video aim to debunk?

The video debunks the 'bigger is better' mentality for handgun calibers, the myth of a single 'showstopper' round, and the idea that specific large calibers are essential for stopping power against dangerous threats. It emphasizes that handgun rounds are inherently limited and effectiveness relies on capacity, controllability, and accurate shot placement.

Related News

All News →

More Training & Techniques Videos You Might Like

More from Trench Grenade

View all →