Videos tagged with XM193

This video conducts a penetration test comparing XM193 FMJ and M855 Green Tip 5.56 NATO ammunition against RTS Tactical Level IV ceramic body armor. The test also includes evaluations of 9mm, .44 Magnum, and .30-06 rounds against the same armor, highlighting differences in performance and the effectiveness of the body armor against various calibers. The video aims to inform viewers interested in ballistics and body armor capabilities.

This video features an in-depth ballistic testing of the RTS Tactical Level IV Ceramic Plate Carrier Active Shooter Kit, utilizing a powerful Smith & Wesson 460 Performance Center revolver. The test goes beyond basic penetration, aiming to subject the body armor to extreme conditions. The video also teases additional testing with other firearms including a .44 Magnum, Springfield 30-06, CZ Shadow 2 9mm, and an AR-15 in 5.56 NATO with different ammunition types, promising a comprehensive look at the plate's capabilities and performance under various calibers and firearm platforms.

This video features a comprehensive penetration and durability test of the RTS Tactical Level IV Ceramic Plate Carrier Active Shooter Kit. The reviewer subjects the armor to a variety of calibers and firearms, including 9mm, .44 Magnum, .30-06, .460 S&W, and 5.56 NATO (XM193 and M855 Green Tip) from AR-15 platforms. The test aims to determine how well the Level IV ceramic plate withstands extreme conditions and multiple impacts. The reviewer expresses initial impressions of being "extremely impressed" with the plate carrier's resilience.

This video conducts a penetration test comparing M855 and M193 5.56 NATO ammunition fired from a POF P415 Edge rifle. The test involves measuring penetration through paper bundles and also includes a velocity test using a Garmin C1 Pro chronograph to compare actual FPS to stated values. A brief overview of the P415 Edge rifle's features is also provided. The description also links to other firearm-related videos.

This YouTube video provides a 500-round review of the Bear Creek Arsenal (BCA) AR-15 M4, highlighting it as one of the most affordable AR platforms available. The reviewer tests the rifle's accuracy using Federal XM193 and .223 ammunition, and also conducts rapid-fire testing on gongs to assess reliability. The video includes velocity checks using a Garmin X1 Pro with the 16-inch barrel. Additionally, the reviewer demonstrates and discusses the use of a Level IV plate carrier from RTS Tactical. The content aims to be educational and entertaining for firearms enthusiasts.

This video provides an honest review of the Bear Creek Arsenal (BCA) AR-15 "Parkerized" model, highlighting it as one of the most affordable AR platforms available. The review includes testing its accuracy with Federal XM193 and .223 ammunition, rapid fire testing to identify potential malfunctions, a chronograph test using the Garmin Xero C1 Pro to measure FPS from a 16-inch barrel, and a trigger test. The video also features a brief mention and link to a Sig MPX K 9mm PCC review, indicating potential comparative or related content.

This YouTube video features a comparison of XM193 FMJ ammunition versus 5.56 NATO M855 green tip rounds fired from a POF 5.56 AR-15. The comparison focuses on penetration testing against a tree, with the addition of a 7.62 AAC suppressor. Slow-motion footage is utilized to provide a detailed view of the impact. The video also mentions the use of a Bog tripod and an "ordinary factory AR15."

This video conducts a penetration test comparing M855 green tip and XM193 5.56 NATO ammunition fired from a POF AR-15. The test utilizes a 7.62 AAC suppressor and involves firing at a tree. Slow-motion footage will be provided to observe the impact up close. The firearm is supported by a Bog tripod. The description also includes links to related videos, the creator's Patreon and Rumble channels, and a disclaimer regarding responsible firearm handling and legal compliance.

This video features a dramatic comparison between a .50 BMG rifle (likely a Barrett) and an AR-15, both engaged in an attempt to fell a 2-foot diameter tree. The description highlights the raw power of the .50 caliber round, emphasizing its effectiveness against the tree. It also mentions the use of 5.56mm XM193 and green tip ammunition for the AR-15, totaling 180 rounds fired from that platform, contrasted with 7 rounds of .50 BMG. Suppressed firing is also noted for the .50 caliber. The video aims to visually demonstrate the destructive capability of the .50 BMG.

This video compares the effectiveness of a .50 caliber Barrett and an AR-15 with 5.56 NATO green tip XM193 rounds in felling a 2-foot diameter tree. It highlights the power difference between the .50 BMG and the smaller AR-15 caliber. The description also links to a full video of the tree felling and another demonstrating calibers shooting through a steel beam, alongside links to their Patreon and Rumble channels. A disclaimer emphasizes the educational and entertainment nature of the content and advises caution.

This video provides a detailed review of the Mitchell Defense SOIDC DOC AR-15 rifle, highlighting its exceptional features and performance. The review emphasizes its bullet-machined upper and lower receivers, ambidextrous controls, and a 16-inch 1-7 twist 223 Wylde Proof Research Carbon Fiber barrel with a mid-length gas system. The rifle demonstrates sub-MOA accuracy with various ammunition types, including military ball and match-grade loads. Key components like the M16 profile bolt carrier group, Radian Raptor charging handle, Geissele two-stage trigger, and Magpul furniture are discussed. The review concludes that the rifle is ideal for precision long-range shooting, SPR, and DMR applications, praising its reliability, flat shooting, and veteran-owned manufacturing.

This video compares the penetration capabilities of M855A1, M855, SS109, and XM193 ammunition against various steel plates. The M855A1 demonstrated superior performance, penetrating 1/2 inch mild steel, while only surface craters were left on AR500 steel. The test highlighted differences in penetration even between M855 and SS109, attributed to manufacturing variations and velocity.