An Immensely Dangerous Ruling From the 10th Circuit

The Supreme Court has accepted a second gun case for the term, United States v. Hammani, challenging federal law prohibiting firearm possession by unlawful controlled substance users (18 U.S. Code § 922(g)(3)). The Fifth Circuit previously found this law unconstitutional as applied to Hammani. The Department of Justice is petitioning to overturn this ruling, aiming to preserve the statute. The case's specific facts, involving allegations of terrorism ties and drug dealing, may negatively impact its broader implications for Second Amendment rights, especially concerning marijuana use in legal states.

This video analyzes the implications of the Bruen case on firearm possession for marijuana users, specifically referencing the United States v. Harrison ruling that struck down 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(g)(3). The discussion highlights that despite this ruling, federal law still prohibits firearm possession by marijuana users as it categorizes marijuana similarly to other illicit substances. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explains how the Bruen decision is prompting courts to re-evaluate restrictive firearm laws and their historical justifications. The video aims to educate viewers on the current legal landscape regarding marijuana and firearm ownership.

This video details a significant legal victory where the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New Mexico's 7-day firearm waiting period, ruling it likely violates the Second Amendment. The decision sets precedent for states within the 10th Circuit's jurisdiction and highlights the ongoing legal battles over firearm restrictions. The host emphasizes that delaying a right is akin to denying it, framing waiting periods as an infringement on law-abiding citizens.

This video analyzes the US v. Morgan case, which challenges machine gun bans under the Second Amendment. It details how the 10th Circuit upheld restrictions, contrasting with a district court's ruling. The case is now before the Supreme Court, seeking clarification on which arms are protected by the Second Amendment and how precedent like Heller and Bruen applies to modern firearms.

This video details a significant Second Amendment legal victory where a federal judge in Oklahoma declared a federal gun control law unconstitutional. The ruling, made by Judge Patrick Wyrick, specifically addresses 18 USC 922(g)(3), which prohibits firearm possession by unlawful users of controlled substances, impacting individuals who use marijuana. The court applied the Bruen standard, finding the government failed to provide sufficient historical analogues to justify the broad prohibition.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has preliminarily enjoined New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases in Ortega v. Gisham. The court ruled that the waiting period infringes upon the Second Amendment by restricting the right to acquire firearms, which is a necessary predicate to keeping and bearing them. This decision emphasizes that such restrictions burden fundamental rights and lack historical justification.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.