AP tells journalist NOT to use made up term "Assault Rifle"… Hell freezing over yet AGAIN…

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling in Charles v. Salazar, arguing it significantly impacts future Second Amendment cases, particularly those involving AR-15 bans. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment advocate, explains how the Court's rejection of Colorado's attempt to redefine speech as conduct sets a precedent against states using arbitrary labels to ban firearms. The ruling suggests the Supreme Court will scrutinize the definitions of 'assault weapon' and 'large capacity magazine' used by anti-gun jurisdictions.

This video explores the reasons and justifications behind individuals owning firearms often categorized as "assault" weapons. It aims to address common public perceptions and provide a counter-narrative, likely delving into self-defense, sport shooting, or historical/technical aspects that might inform such ownership choices. The content seeks to educate viewers on the practical and potential applications of these types of firearms.

This video argues for the appropriate terminology of 'Modern Sporting Rifle' for AR-15 platforms, distinguishing them from 'assault rifles' based on semi-automatic versus fully automatic fire. It emphasizes that the Second Amendment protects individual rights, citing Supreme Court decisions like Heller and McDonald, and that the right to self-defense is a fundamental human right. The speaker, Massa from Wilson Combat, uses historical context and legal interpretation to support these points.

This video, titled "Stupid Gun Control Arguments pt.1 : 'Assault Weapon/Rifle'", appears to be the first part of a series addressing common arguments surrounding gun control, specifically focusing on the definition and discussion of "assault weapons" or "assault rifles". The description provides links for channel support, merchandise, and affiliate products such as Werkz Holster and Gatorz Glasses. It emphasizes that the content is for educational purposes, with views belonging to the creator and not intended for sales facilitation. The creator clarifies that they do not sell firearms and all live firing is conducted safely and professionally.

This expert-level analysis from Military Arms Channel clarifies the distinction between modern sporting rifles (like the AR-15) and true military assault rifles. The key difference is the ability to fire fully automatic, a feature banned for civilian ownership since 1986 under the Hughes Amendment. The video debunks common misconceptions about features defining assault rifles and demonstrates the minimal practical impact of proposed magazine capacity bans.

This video critically examines the legal and technical aspects of the Judge Kano case, challenging the sensationalized narrative. It debunks the claim that 'assault rifles' were given to a cartel member, explaining that the term requires fully automatic capability, which was not evidenced. The discussion also delves into the broader implications for gun rights, the definition of inalienable rights, and potential government overreach in enforcing immigration and firearms laws.

This video features Governor Chris Sununu effectively debating gun control arguments presented on 'The View.' The analysis highlights Sununu's counter-arguments regarding the ineffectiveness of bans like the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, particularly in cities like Chicago, and emphasizes mental health and school security as more pertinent solutions. The content is presented with an authoritative tone from Langley Outdoors Academy, offering insights into political discourse surrounding firearms.

This video from Langley Outdoors Academy, featuring Braden, analyzes the political landscape surrounding gun control in America. It suggests that recent statements from the Biden administration, particularly regarding potential executive actions on gun control, indicate a lack of legislative support. The speaker, identified as experienced, interprets these moves as a sign of political weakness rather than a strong push for new legislation.

This video from Langley Outdoors Academy discusses Senator Joe Manchin's defiance of President Biden's nominee for the Office of Management and Budget. The speaker, with an authoritative and experienced tone, suggests this political maneuver has significant implications for the Second Amendment, potentially hindering Biden's ability to pass broader gun control measures due to a lack of unity within the Democratic party. The commentary highlights Manchin's role as a crucial swing vote and offers a cautiously optimistic outlook for gun rights advocates, especially with upcoming midterms.

This video details a significant confrontation between the VA and Congress regarding veterans' Second Amendment rights. The VA, through its director Kevin Friel, has stated it will not comply with legislation aimed at restoring gun rights to veterans deemed mentally incompetent for financial management, even if passed by Congress. This defiance is framed as a usurpation of power, potentially linked to the interpretation of laws like the Brady Act and the implications of the overturned Chevron Deference ruling. The Gun Owners of America (GOA) is actively highlighting this issue, emphasizing the potential impact on a quarter-million veterans.