Assault Weapon Ban is Unconstitutional

Published on January 30, 2013
Duration: 3:51

This video argues that proposed assault weapons bans are unconstitutional, citing the Supreme Court's rulings in Miller v. United States and Heller v. District of Columbia. It posits that firearms 'in common use' by the military, such as the AR-15 and 30-round magazines, are protected under the Second Amendment.

Quick Summary

Proposed assault weapon bans may be unconstitutional, as argued by legal analysis referencing Supreme Court cases like Miller v. United States and Heller v. District of Columbia. These rulings suggest that firearms 'in common use' by the military, such as AR-15s and 30-round magazines, are protected under the Second Amendment.

Chapters

  1. 00:10Proposed Assault Weapons Ban
  2. 00:18National Firearms Act of 1934
  3. 00:40Miller v. United States Case
  4. 01:30Supreme Court's Miller Ruling
  5. 01:57AR-15s and the Second Amendment
  6. 02:35Magazine Capacity Bans
  7. 02:49Heller Decision Impact
  8. 03:02Supreme Court's Role
  9. 03:15Political Opposition
  10. 03:24Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What legal precedent is used to argue against assault weapon bans?

The argument against assault weapon bans heavily relies on the Supreme Court's ruling in Miller v. United States (1938), which established that the Second Amendment protects firearms 'commonly used by the militia or the military of the time.' This is further supported by the Heller v. District of Columbia decision, which affirmed an individual right to bear arms.

Why are AR-15s considered protected under the Second Amendment according to this analysis?

The video posits that AR-15s are 'commonly used firearms' by the U.S. military. Based on the precedent set by Miller v. United States, firearms in common military use are argued to be protected under the Second Amendment, making a ban on AR-15s unconstitutional.

Does the Second Amendment protect high-capacity magazines?

The video argues that by proxy, 30-round magazines are also protected under the Second Amendment. This is because the military uses these magazines, and if military-style firearms in common use are protected, then the accessories integral to their military function, like standard-capacity magazines, should also be protected.

What historical law is mentioned in relation to firearm regulation?

The National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 is discussed. This act required the registration of certain types of firearms with the federal government and imposed a $200 tax, which was a significant sum in 1934.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Military Arms Channel

View all →