Braces are BACK! Federal Judge STAYS Entire Brace Ban Rule!

Published on November 28, 2023
Duration: 12:35

A federal judge has issued a stay on the ATF's pistol brace ban rule in the case of Britto v. ATF. This ruling, citing a high likelihood of success for the plaintiffs and irreparable harm, effectively reinstates the previous status of pistol braces. The decision draws parallels to the Mock v. Garland ruling and highlights concerns about executive overreach in firearm regulation.

Quick Summary

A federal judge has issued a stay on the ATF's pistol brace ban rule in the case of Britto v. ATF. This ruling means that pistol braces are currently legal to possess and use, effectively reinstating the status quo before the ban. The judge cited a high likelihood of success for the plaintiffs and irreparable harm as reasons for the stay.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: ATF Pistol Brace Situation
  2. 00:31Sponsor: CMMG AR Parts
  3. 01:07Federal Judge Stays Brace Rule
  4. 02:13Gun Owner Options Under the Ban
  5. 03:18Plaintiff Likelihood of Success
  6. 03:42Plaintiff Gabriel Tauscher's Case
  7. 04:01Mock v Garland Analysis
  8. 06:14Courts Handing Out Doozies
  9. 07:30Brace Pistols Are Back!
  10. 07:59ATF Knew It Would Fail
  11. 08:57Power of the Pen
  12. 09:40We Are Winning
  13. 10:47More Content Coming
  14. 11:40Appreciation and Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current legal status of ATF pistol braces?

A federal judge has issued a stay on the ATF's pistol brace ban rule in the case of Britto v. ATF. This means that pistol braces are currently legal to possess and use, effectively reinstating the status quo before the ban.

Why did the federal judge stay the ATF brace ban rule?

The judge ruled that the plaintiffs challenging the ban had a high likelihood of success and would suffer irreparable harm without an injunction. The decision was heavily influenced by the precedent set in the Mock v. Garland ruling.

What were the options for gun owners under the ATF brace ban?

Under the original ATF rule, gun owners had four options: register the firearm with the ATF, replace the barrel with one over 16 inches, remove and destroy the brace, or turn in the firearm to the ATF. Many viewed these options as forced confiscation.

What is the significance of the Britto v. ATF ruling?

The Britto v. ATF ruling is significant because it halts the enforcement of the ATF's pistol brace ban nationwide, at least temporarily. It represents a legal victory for gun owners and challenges the ATF's regulatory authority.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →