BREAKING: DOJ Throws Biden on Altar of Gun Control… CAN’T Use Second Amendment Grounds For Defense

Published on January 17, 2024
Duration: 7:15

This analysis from Langley Outdoors Academy delves into the DOJ's stance on Hunter Biden's gun charges, arguing he cannot use the Second Amendment as a defense due to his history of substance abuse. The expert instructor highlights the legal arguments, including the 'public safety' and 'Anglo-American law' precedents cited by the DOJ, and discusses the significant political implications of this case during an election year.

Quick Summary

The DOJ argues that Hunter Biden cannot use the Second Amendment as a defense in his federal gun charges. Their legal reasoning cites 'Anglo-American law' and the principle that individuals with a history of substance abuse pose a public safety risk, thus forfeiting their right to bear arms.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Hunter Biden Case Overview
  2. 00:38Sponsor Segment: American Hartford Gold
  3. 01:47Hunter Biden's Gun Charge & Bruen Decision
  4. 02:26Reuters Report: DOJ's Stance
  5. 03:10DOJ's 'Public Safety' Argument
  6. 03:47Irony of Hunter Biden's Defense
  7. 04:03DOJ's Anglo-American Law Argument
  8. 04:17Anglo-American Law Implications
  9. 05:13Defense vs. Prosecution & Election Year
  10. 06:18Historical Precedent (1328) & European Gun Laws

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Hunter Biden use the Second Amendment as a defense in his federal gun charges?

According to the DOJ's legal arguments, Hunter Biden cannot use the Second Amendment as a defense. The DOJ contends that his history of substance abuse makes him a public safety risk, thereby disqualifying him from Second Amendment protections for firearm possession.

What legal precedent is the DOJ citing against Hunter Biden's Second Amendment defense?

The DOJ is citing 'Anglo-American law,' referencing historical statutes dating back to 1328 in England. They argue that this historical legal tradition supports the government's authority to disarm individuals who, due to their conduct or characteristics, present an increased risk to public safety.

How does the Bruen decision relate to Hunter Biden's gun case?

Hunter Biden's legal team intended to use the Supreme Court's Bruen decision to argue that felony gun charges based on a history of drug use are unconstitutional due to a lack of historical tradition. However, the DOJ is countering this by asserting historical precedents that allow for disarming those deemed a public safety risk.

What are the political implications of the DOJ's stance on Hunter Biden's gun charges?

The DOJ's decision to deny the Second Amendment defense and proceed with the trial is politically significant, especially during an election year. It creates an awkward situation for the Biden White House, as the President is a proponent of stricter gun control measures.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →