California: NRA Sues San Francisco Over Ammo Magazine Ban

Published on November 21, 2013
Duration: 8:34

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by the NRA and the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association challenging San Francisco's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The legal challenge centers on the Second Amendment, arguing that such magazines are in common use for lawful purposes, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in Heller. The discussion also touches on the Ninth Circuit's adoption of an intermediate scrutiny standard for Second Amendment cases, potentially impacting future litigation.

Quick Summary

The NRA and the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association are challenging San Francisco's ban on magazines holding over 10 rounds. The lawsuit argues that these magazines are in common use for lawful purposes, a right protected by the Second Amendment as per the Supreme Court's Heller decision. The case also touches on the Ninth Circuit's adoption of intermediate scrutiny for Second Amendment challenges.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Lawsuit
  2. 00:17San Francisco Magazine Ban Details
  3. 00:52Plaintiff: Veteran Police Officers Association
  4. 01:27Second Amendment Challenge Basis
  5. 01:55Common Use Argument
  6. 02:22Historical Context of Magazines
  7. 03:14Concealed Carry Permits in California
  8. 04:04Rationale for Higher Capacity Magazines
  9. 05:06CCW Trends and San Francisco Policy
  10. 05:33California CCW Permit System Issues
  11. 06:23Changing Attitudes in Rural California
  12. 07:18Peruta Case and Ninth Circuit Standard
  13. 07:33Intermediate Scrutiny Explained
  14. 08:10Impact on Peruta Case

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main legal challenge against San Francisco's magazine ban?

The primary legal challenge is based on the Second Amendment, arguing that magazines holding more than 10 rounds are in common use by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, a standard protected by the Supreme Court's Heller decision. The lawsuit was filed by the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association with NRA support.

Who are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against San Francisco's magazine ban?

The plaintiffs include the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association, a group of retired law enforcement officers. The lawsuit is supported by the NRA, and the National Shooting Sports Foundation may also pursue challenges against other gun control measures in the city.

What is the significance of magazines being 'in common use' in the context of the Second Amendment?

The 'common use' standard, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Heller, means that firearms and accessories widely possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as self-defense, sporting, or hunting, are protected under the Second Amendment. The lawsuit argues that high-capacity magazines fall into this category.

What is the Ninth Circuit's standard of review for Second Amendment cases?

The Ninth Circuit has adopted an intermediate scrutiny standard for Second Amendment cases. This standard allows judges more discretion to weigh government interests against individual rights, which can be problematic as it may allow personal values to influence legal decisions.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →