Clarence Thomas DESTROYS Opinion Of Today's Anti-2A Ruling!
This video analyzes Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent in the Supreme Court's decision regarding Zachary Rahimi's case, which involved a federal law prohibiting individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. Thomas argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second Amendment and due process by automatically disarming individuals without requiring proof of a crime or a finding of dangerousness, and without sufficient historical precedent. The analysis emphasizes the historical tradition of firearm regulation and the burden of proof on the government.










