Dana Loesch: Calling out the Liberal Media’s Whining

This video from NRATV directly addresses CNN anchor Alisyn Camerota, accusing her of lying on air about NRA members and the NRA itself. The content creator asserts that Camerota allowed individuals to label NRA members as 'child murderers,' which they deem unacceptable. The message is a direct challenge to CNN's reporting practices, framing them as deceptive attempts to undermine the Second Amendment and the NRA, with the ultimate goal of harming gun owners. NRATV pledges to continuously call out CNN's alleged misinformation.

This video features Dana Loesch speaking to CNN, asserting that many in the media "love mass shootings" due to the ratings and extensive coverage they receive. Loesch argues that media outlets prioritize displaying the perpetrator's face repeatedly over discussing victims and survivors. The content revolves around a critique of media coverage related to gun violence and mass shootings, suggesting a perceived bias in how these events are reported.

This video features Dana Loesch speaking at CPAC 2018, directly addressing CNN's reporting on gun violence. Loesch challenges the media's narrative, suggesting a bias that she believes sensationalizes mass shootings. Her statement, "I call BS," directly confronts perceived media agendas. The context is post-CNN Town Hall, where the legacy press's approach to the issue of gun violence is questioned.

This YouTube video features Dana Loesch discussing what she considers the "best fake news" of 2017. The content revolves around media bias and alleged inaccuracies, specifically mentioning Brian Ross and CNN in the context of President Trump's "Fake News Awards." The video encourages viewer participation by asking for their own favorite examples of "fake news" in the comments section.

This video features Dana Loesch discussing her views on media coverage. She claims that the mainstream media has been more critical of President Trump than of Kim Jong Un. The title and description do not mention any specific firearms, calibers, manufacturers, or firearm-related activities, but rather focus on political commentary and media analysis.

This video, titled 'The Truth About March for Our Lives,' features commentary from Grant Stinchfield. He asserts that the March for Our Lives event is a 'well-organized machine' and not simply a spontaneous gathering of young people. The description highlights Stinchfield's perspective on the organization and execution of the event, implying a level of professional coordination rather than organic grassroots mobilization.

This NRA News segment features Dom Raso, a U.S. Navy SEAL veteran, dissecting instances of public figures allegedly misrepresenting military experiences for personal gain. Raso contrasts fabricated or exaggerated claims, such as Hillary Clinton's Bosnia 'sniper fire' story, with the harsh realities of combat, emphasizing the importance of truthfulness and accountability for those seeking leadership positions. The video highlights the gravity of military service and the ethical implications of exploiting it for political advancement.

Armed citizens Jack Wilson and Stephen Willeford, who stopped mass shooters, critically analyze Joe Biden's proposed gun control measures. They highlight the ineffectiveness of 'shoot them in the leg' advice in real-world scenarios and defend the AR-15 platform against mischaracterizations. The discussion emphasizes the potential financial burden of proposed taxes and the criminalization of private gun transfers under 'universal background checks,' urging viewers to support the NRA.

This video emphasizes the NRA's mission to defend Second Amendment rights against perceived threats from 'elites' and gun control advocates. Speakers like Wayne LaPierre and Donald Trump Jr. highlight the importance of firearm ownership for personal safety and freedom. The NRA is presented as the primary organization fighting to preserve these rights for law-abiding citizens.

This video details the case of Austin Tong, a Fordham University student charged with a hate crime for posting a picture of an AR-15, citing self-defense needs due to rising crime and anti-Asian sentiment. The university's misidentification of the rifle as automatic and subsequent disciplinary actions are highlighted, with Tong arguing for his Second Amendment rights and planning legal action against the university for alleged free speech violations. The NRA and 'Students for 2A' are supporting his defense.