Dangerous Liberty LIVE Ep166 - Blake Bednarz - Was There A Device In Charlie Kirk's Shirt?

Published on November 13, 2025
Duration: 155:46

This episode of Dangerous Liberty LIVE features Blake Bednarz discussing his analysis of the Charlie Kirk incident. Bednarz disputes the official narrative, suggesting the wound was not from a firearm but potentially an explosive device. He delves into ballistics, questioning the likelihood of a .30-06 round causing the observed injury and critiquing the evidence presented by law enforcement, particularly security camera footage and text message interpretations. The discussion highlights skepticism towards official investigations and the need for rigorous, evidence-based analysis in legal proceedings.

Quick Summary

Blake Bednarz disputes the official narrative of the Charlie Kirk incident, proposing the neck wound resulted from a detonated device, not a .30-06 rifle. His analysis of video footage suggests the wound appeared after the shirt settled, contradicting gunshot wound physics. Bednarz also critiques the FBI's selective evidence release and the presentation of text messages, emphasizing the need for rigorous, verifiable forensic data.

Chapters

  1. 00:05Intro & Welcome
  2. 01:05Show Introduction & Veterans Day Message
  3. 03:03Guest Introduction: Blake Bednarz
  4. 04:31Bednarz's Core Theory: Not a Gunshot
  5. 07:04Questioning the .30-06 Weapon Claim
  6. 09:04Bednarz's Ballistics Expertise Explained
  7. 11:12Essential Ballistics Parameters
  8. 13:10Variations in .30-06 Ammunition
  9. 14:43Skepticism on Official Ballistics Conclusions
  10. 15:31The Impossibility of the Official Narrative
  11. 17:20Anomalous Rounds and Tumbling
  12. 19:57Historical Examples: MLK & Thomas Krooks
  13. 21:44Atypical vs. Impossible Ballistics
  14. 23:03The Prone Perched Position Theory
  15. 23:39Critique of FBI Security Cam Footage
  16. 26:07Analysis of Suspect's Movement on Roof
  17. 28:02Hinges on Allegations and Evidence
  18. 29:08Intent Behind FBI Video Release
  19. 31:06Video Throws Wrench into Narrative
  20. 33:00Timing of Movement Post-Shot
  21. 35:35Coincidence of Incident Timing & Questioning
  22. 37:57Significance of the Screwdriver
  23. 40:40Screwdriver Use: Reassembly Theory
  24. 41:20How the Gun Was Found
  25. 42:28Suspect's Escape and Weapon Disposal Logic
  26. 45:05Weapon Caching Strategy Analysis
  27. 46:59FBI's Role and Evidence Presentation
  28. 48:20Alleged Cover-Up Begins
  29. 49:05Preserving Evidence for Trial
  30. 51:36Transparency in Court Cases
  31. 52:04Plea Deals and Justice
  32. 53:39Likelihood of a Plea Deal
  33. 54:41Disinformation vs. Misinformation
  34. 55:16Erosion of Trust in Institutions
  35. 57:52Blake's Social Media Presence
  36. 59:02Legitimate Phone Extraction Reports
  37. 61:50Standard for Text Message Evidence
  38. 62:18Context of Text Messages in Charging Docs
  39. 63:10Engraving Bullets: Intent vs. Proof
  40. 65:28Credibility of Evidence: Screenshots vs. Reports
  41. 66:34Text Message Analysis: 'Too Perfect'
  42. 68:20The UVU Review Camera Footage
  43. 71:00Discovery of Under-Shirt Event
  44. 73:20Wound Appearance vs. Shirt Movement
  45. 75:14Watermelon Analogy for Wounds
  46. 75:58Pork Roast Ballistics Test
  47. 77:01Impact of Frame Rate on Data
  48. 78:29Wound Bleeding Timing Analysis
  49. 79:58Cavitation and Wound Closure
  50. 80:15Conclusion on Wound Appearance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Blake Bednarz's primary theory regarding the Charlie Kirk incident?

Blake Bednarz's primary theory is that Charlie Kirk's neck wound was not caused by a firearm but by a detonated device placed under his shirt. He argues that the visual evidence, particularly the timing of the wound's appearance relative to the shirt's movement, contradicts the official narrative of a gunshot.

Why does Blake Bednarz doubt the official explanation involving a .30-06 rifle?

Bednarz, with extensive experience in ballistic testing, believes a standard .30-06 round is highly unlikely to cause the observed wound without specific anomalous factors. He questions the energy transfer and wound characteristics presented in the official account, suggesting it doesn't align with typical ballistics.

How does Bednarz critique the FBI's release of security camera footage related to the incident?

Bednarz contends that the FBI strategically released limited footage to obscure crucial events occurring at the edge of the building. He believes this selective release was intended to control the narrative and potentially hide evidence that might contradict the official story.

What are Bednarz's concerns about the evidence presented in the charging documents?

Bednarz expresses skepticism about the presented evidence, including text message transcripts, suggesting they might be selectively presented or manipulated. He emphasizes the need for legitimate, court-admissible forensic reports, like those generated by Cellbrite, for accurate data analysis.

What is Bednarz's view on the credibility of law enforcement and government agencies in this case?

Bednarz voices general distrust towards law enforcement and government agencies, citing past instances of alleged deception. He believes that in this case, as in others, there's a possibility of misleading information being presented, necessitating critical evaluation of all official accounts.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Paramount Tactical

View all →