Dave Kopel on Smart Guns

Published on May 9, 2014
Duration: 7:55

This discussion with Dave Kopel highlights concerns regarding 'smart gun' technology, particularly its reliability and cost. Kopel argues that current smart gun technology, exemplified by the Armatix model, is not suitable for law enforcement or self-defense due to its unreliability and high price point. He also critiques legislative proposals, such as Senator Ed Markey's, which could mandate smart gun technology, suggesting these are intended to ban conventional firearms.

Quick Summary

Current smart gun technology faces significant criticism for unreliability and high costs, making them unsuitable for law enforcement or self-defense. Legislative mandates for smart guns are also viewed as a potential strategy to ban conventional firearms, with media coverage often lacking technical accuracy and exhibiting bias.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Smart Gun Media Attention
  2. 00:15The Armatix Smart Gun and its Price Point
  3. 01:11Reliability Concerns for Law Enforcement
  4. 01:52Mayors and Smart Guns for Law Enforcement
  5. 03:04Bloomberg and Smart Gun Adoption
  6. 03:40Senator Ed Markey's Smart Gun Legislation
  7. 04:18New Jersey's Smart Gun Law and Potential Ban
  8. 05:25Mainstream Media Understanding of Smart Guns
  9. 06:01Future of Smart Guns and Media Coverage
  10. 06:30Media Bias and Reporting on Gun Issues
  11. 07:18Conclusion and Dave Kopel's Work

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main criticisms of current smart gun technology?

The primary criticisms of current smart gun technology, such as the Armatix model, revolve around their unreliability, high cost (around $1,800 plus accessories), and the fact that they are often only available in lower calibers like .22, making them unsuitable for critical self-defense situations.

Why don't law enforcement officers use smart guns?

Law enforcement officers do not carry smart guns because reliability is a non-negotiable requirement for their duty firearms. The current smart gun technology is not considered dependable enough for the high-stakes, emergency situations officers face, where a firearm must function flawlessly.

What is the potential impact of smart gun mandates on conventional firearms?

Legislative proposals mandating smart gun technology, like those from Senator Ed Markey, are viewed by critics as a strategy to effectively ban conventional firearms. For instance, a New Jersey law could lead to a ban on all normal handguns if smart guns become available.

How does the media typically cover the topic of smart guns?

Media coverage of smart guns often lacks technical depth and can be biased, portraying them as advanced technology without adequately addressing their reliability issues and high costs. This can lead to a misinformed public perception and support for potentially detrimental legislation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →