DOJ Just Declared WAR On The NFA Challenge!

This video breaks down the federal government's defense strategy for the National Firearms Act (NFA) following the elimination of taxes on certain NFA items. The DOJ argues the NFA remains valid through the taxing power (due to remaining occupational taxes), the Commerce Clause, and the Necessary and Proper Clause. It also addresses the Second Amendment challenge by citing historical treatment of certain firearms.

This video analyzes a critical legal challenge to the National Firearms Act (NFA) following the reduction of transfer taxes to zero. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is now attempting to justify NFA registration requirements by linking them to the Special Occupational Tax (SOT) paid by dealers, a strategy plaintiffs argue is a revisionist attempt to preserve federal power and bypass constitutional limits. The case hinges on whether the taxing power can be used to enforce regulations unrelated to direct revenue generation, potentially setting a precedent for broad federal control.

This video discusses a reported policy change by the United States Postal Service (USPS) to no longer ship suppressors and silencers. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, argues this policy would be illegal and unconstitutional. He asserts that suppressors are protected 'arms' under the Second Amendment and that the relevant statute, 18 USC 1715, does not grant the USPS authority to ban their shipment, especially given the 1934 National Firearms Act's specific inclusion of silencers. The speaker references a Trump administration DOJ Office of Legal Counsel opinion that found 18 USC 1715 unconstitutional as applied to handguns, suggesting a similar argument would apply to suppressors.

This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's ruling in United States v. De Borba, which held that illegal aliens are not protected by the Second Amendment and that suppressors are not considered 'arms' under the plain text of the amendment. The speaker argues this decision sets a dangerous precedent, misinterprets Supreme Court rulings like Bruin v. DC, and incorrectly equates the NFA's registration scheme with historical licensing regimes. The analysis emphasizes the potential negative impact on future Second Amendment litigation, particularly concerning suppressors.

This video discusses the Fiscal Year 2027 Commerce Justice Science Appropriations Bill, highlighting provisions aimed at protecting Second Amendment rights. Key points include the repeal of Biden-era ATF rules, such as the pistol brace rule and regulations on privately made firearms and universal background checks. The bill also seeks to eliminate NFA registration requirements for suppressors and short-barreled firearms, and establishes a Second Amendment Rights Section within the DOJ. The speaker emphasizes the importance of these measures in countering perceived overreach by the ATF and DOJ.

This video analyzes the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in *United States v. Kamu*, which found that suppressors are 'arms' protected by the Second Amendment. While this is a positive step, the court was bound by the prior *US v. Peterson* decision, which upheld the NFA's registration scheme as constitutional. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, argues that *Peterson* was wrongly decided and that the NFA registration requirement likely violates the Second Amendment, citing historical precedent and dissenting opinions within the *Kamu* case itself.

This entry details a significant lawsuit against Cabela's concerning ammunition sales and its potential ramifications for the entire firearms retail industry. The case, involving a fatal shooting by a 19-year-old, hinges on claims of negligence and exceptions to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). Expert analysis suggests this could lead to broader liability for retailers if not dismissed.

This video, updated from a 2015 version, analyzes 2020 ATF registration data to rank US states by the number of registered NFA items. The speaker, an expert in 2A news, highlights that these figures represent legally owned items and are expected to grow. The analysis focuses on categories like Destructive Devices, Machineguns, Silencers, SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs, providing state-by-state breakdowns and concluding with commentary on gun owner rights.

This entry details the US Army's Modular Handgun System (MHS) contract decision, where the Sig Sauer P320 (M17/M18) was selected over Glock's submission. The analysis highlights key MHS requirements, the specific features of each submission, and crucially, the significant cost difference that heavily influenced the final decision. The Sig Sauer M17/M18 will replace the Beretta M9 in service.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses China's official stance that US citizens owning firearms is a serious problem requiring change. The host critically analyzes this statement, contrasting it with China's own human rights record and political system, while also referencing historical figures and current political figures like Senator Ben Sasse and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The content emphasizes the importance of the Second Amendment and warns against foreign influence on US gun policy.