Don't Disarm Pilots

Published on March 21, 2012
Duration: 8:22

This video discusses proposed budget cuts to the Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program, arguing they are ideologically driven and detrimental to aviation security. The program, which allows airline pilots to carry firearms, is presented as inexpensive and highly effective, especially when compared to the perceived inefficiencies of TSA security theater. The discussion highlights the historical context of gun-free cockpits and the lessons learned from 9/11.

Quick Summary

The Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program allows trained airline pilots to carry firearms in the cockpit, acting as a vital security measure against hijackings. Despite being highly effective and inexpensive, proposed budget cuts are seen as ideologically driven, aiming to dismantle the program due to opposition to armed pilots. The program's cost is minimal compared to its significant contribution to aviation safety.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: FFDO Program Cuts
  2. 00:22Ideological Opposition to Armed Pilots
  3. 01:01Dangers of Gun-Free Zones
  4. 01:29Fiscal Insignificance of FFDO Program
  5. 01:44Volunteer Pilots Defending Flights
  6. 02:13Source of Administration's Stance
  7. 03:01FFDO vs. Federal Air Marshals
  8. 04:28Critique of 'Risk-Based' Security
  9. 06:39Security Theater vs. Real Security
  10. 07:34Pilot Expertise in Aviation Security

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program?

The Federal Flight Deck Officer (FFDO) program is a U.S. federal initiative that allows specially trained and authorized airline pilots to carry firearms in the cockpit. Its primary goal is to deter and defend against hijackings and terrorist attacks on commercial aircraft, enhancing aviation security from within the flight deck.

Why are budget cuts proposed for the FFDO program?

The video suggests that proposed budget cuts to the FFDO program are not driven by fiscal necessity but by an ideological opposition within the Obama administration to airline pilots carrying guns. This opposition is seen as a primary motivator for attempting to dismantle or weaken the program.

How effective and costly is the FFDO program?

The FFDO program is described as extremely effective and very inexpensive. Pilots participate voluntarily and are not paid for this duty, making it a highly cost-efficient security measure. The program's cost is a tiny fraction of the federal deficit and significantly less than other security measures like the Federal Air Marshal Service.

What are the arguments against the administration's 'risk-based' security approach?

Critics argue that the administration's 'risk-based' security approach, which aims to cut the FFDO program, is flawed and amounts to 'security theater.' They contend that relying solely on intelligence and TSA screening ignores visible risks and that armed pilots, with their intimate knowledge of aircraft operations, are a more reliable deterrent.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →