Fed Judge Orders Cops to Stop Carrying Sig P320

Published on October 6, 2025
Duration: 5:50

A federal judge has ordered the Chicago Police Department to stop allowing officers to carry the Sig Sauer P320 as their duty weapon. This decision stems from safety concerns and a lawsuit filed by the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7, citing the risk of unintentional discharges and potential litigation for the city. The ruling mandates that officers with alternative service weapons must switch immediately.

Quick Summary

A federal judge has ordered Chicago police to stop carrying the Sig P320 as their duty weapon due to safety concerns and the risk of unintentional discharges. The Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7 filed a lawsuit, and the ruling mandates officers with alternative firearms to switch immediately.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Judge Orders Chicago Police to Stop Carrying Sig P320
  2. 00:12Introduction to the P320 Saga
  3. 00:52Lawsuit Origin: Police Union Concerns
  4. 01:54Police Union Seeks Ban on P320
  5. 02:34CPD Arsenal Committee Vote
  6. 03:00Court Findings on Officer Compliance
  7. 03:39No Injuries Reported Yet, But Risk Remains
  8. 04:03Potential Litigation and Liability
  9. 04:25Judge's Ruling and Order Details
  10. 04:52Context: Chicago Suing Glock
  11. 05:14Sig's Potential Reaction and Future Lawsuits
  12. 05:29Video Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did a federal judge order Chicago police to stop carrying the Sig P320?

A federal judge ordered Chicago police to stop carrying the Sig P320 due to safety concerns, specifically the risk of unintentional discharges. The Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 7 filed a lawsuit citing these concerns and the potential for expensive litigation if an incident occurred.

What was the Chicago Police Department's stance on the Sig P320 before the judge's order?

The Chicago Police Department's Arsenal Committee had already voted unanimously in April to phase out the use of the Sig P320 because of reported safety concerns. However, compliance with the transition was slow.

What are the implications of the judge's ruling for Chicago police officers?

The ruling mandates that Chicago police officers who have an alternative service weapon that meets appropriate standards must immediately switch to using that alternative weapon, effectively banning the Sig P320 for on-duty use.

What legal risks were cited regarding the Sig P320 in Chicago?

Union leaders warned of significant legal risks, including expensive and unnecessary litigation for the city and officers, if an unintentional discharge of the Sig P320 occurred and it was found that the hazard could have been avoided by prohibiting its use.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Liberty Doll

View all →