Gun Gripes 373: Is Pam Bondi REALLY Pro Gun?
This video discusses the implications of the DOJ's stance in the Rush v. United States Supreme Court case, where they argued against hearing the case challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker expresses concern over Pam Bondi's DOJ seemingly defending the NFA, contrasting it with the Trump administration's pro-2A claims. The analysis delves into the Bruen standard and historical interpretations of the Second Amendment, suggesting the NFA may be on borrowed time despite the DOJ's current position.











