Highland Park Families Now Suing Smith & Wesson Because Shooter Used Their Rifle

Published on October 1, 2022
Duration: 6:19

This video, presented by an expert with years of experience, details the lawsuits filed by Highland Park families against Smith & Wesson, alleging deceptive marketing practices for the M&P 15 rifle used in the attack. It critically examines the legal strategies employed, drawing parallels to previous cases like Sandy Hook and Robb Elementary, and argues that these lawsuits aim to bankrupt the gun industry through prolonged legal battles rather than seeking justice. The presenter emphasizes the importance of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act and warns of its potential circumvention.

Quick Summary

Highland Park families are suing Smith & Wesson, alleging deceptive marketing of the M&P 15 rifle used in the attack violated Illinois consumer protection laws. This mirrors tactics used in lawsuits against Remington and Daniel Defense, aiming to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by focusing on marketing misconduct. The speaker argues these suits aim to bankrupt the gun industry through prolonged legal battles.

Chapters

  1. 00:05Families Sue Gun Manufacturer
  2. 00:17Smith & Wesson M&P15 Lawsuit Details
  3. 00:32Allegations of Training Mass Shooters
  4. 00:42Lawsuit Targets Shooter, Father, Bud's Gun
  5. 00:53Previous Remington Lawsuit Discussion
  6. 01:14Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act Explained
  7. 01:36Sandy Hook Lawsuit Workaround Tactics
  8. 02:06Weaponizing Lawsuits to Bankrupt Companies
  9. 02:54Robb Elementary Lawsuit Overview
  10. 03:05Repeating Legal Tactics Against Gun Companies
  11. 03:24Goal: Create Endless Legal Battles
  12. 03:50Insurance Companies Dropping Gun Companies
  13. 04:04Attorneys Profiting from Lawsuits
  14. 04:32Massacre Chasers Accusation
  15. 05:12Closing Loopholes in Federal Law
  16. 05:34Impact on Gun Availability
  17. 05:41Second Amendment Empowerment

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Highland Park families suing Smith & Wesson?

Highland Park families are suing Smith & Wesson, alleging that the M&P 15 rifle used in the attack was marketed deceptively, violating Illinois consumer protection laws. They claim the company's marketing practices are irresponsible and contribute to mass shootings.

What is the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)?

PLCAA is a federal law protecting gun manufacturers from liability when their products are used in crimes, provided they followed all state and federal laws. It aims to prevent frivolous lawsuits designed to bankrupt the industry.

How are lawsuits attempting to circumvent PLCAA?

Attorneys are using arguments that manufacturers violated state marketing laws or engaged in deceptive practices, similar to the Sandy Hook case against Remington. This shifts the focus from the criminal misuse of the firearm to the manufacturer's marketing conduct.

What is the alleged goal of these lawsuits against gun manufacturers?

The speaker suggests the primary goal is not to win individual cases but to inundate gun companies with numerous, costly lawsuits, forcing them into bankruptcy or expensive settlements due to prolonged legal battles and potential loss of insurance.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →