Highland Park Families Now Suing Smith & Wesson Because Shooter Used Their Rifle

Published on October 1, 2022
Duration: 6:19

This analysis by Colion Noir details the lawsuit filed by Highland Park families against Smith & Wesson, alleging responsibility for the mass shooting due to deceptive marketing. It explores how plaintiffs are attempting to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) by claiming violations of Illinois consumer protection laws, a tactic previously used against Remington. The video highlights concerns that such lawsuits aim to bankrupt gun manufacturers through prolonged legal battles, potentially leading to a de facto ban on firearms by eliminating manufacturers.

Quick Summary

Highland Park families are suing Smith & Wesson, alleging deceptive marketing of the M&P 15 rifle used in the shooting violated Illinois consumer protection laws. This strategy aims to bypass the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which generally shields manufacturers from liability for criminal misuse of their products.

Chapters

  1. 00:05Highland Park Families Sue Gun Manufacturer
  2. 00:17Smith & Wesson M&P15 Lawsuit Details
  3. 00:32Allegations of Training Mass Shooters
  4. 00:42Lawsuit Targets Shooter, Father, and Retailers
  5. 00:53Previous Remington Lawsuit & PLCAA
  6. 01:14How PLCAA Works and Its Limitations
  7. 01:36Sandy Hook Lawsuit's Legal Workaround
  8. 02:06Weaponizing Lawsuits to Bankrupt Gun Companies
  9. 02:54Robb Elementary Lawsuit Against Daniel Defense
  10. 03:05Repeating Tactics Against Smith & Wesson
  11. 03:24The Goal: Endless Legal Battles
  12. 03:50Insurance Companies Dropping Gun Companies
  13. 04:04Destroying the Gun Industry for Profit
  14. 04:32Attorneys Profiting from Mass Shooting Lawsuits
  15. 05:12Call to Action: Close Legal Loopholes
  16. 05:34No Gun Rights Without Manufacturers
  17. 05:41Second Amendment Empowerment

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Highland Park families suing Smith & Wesson?

Highland Park families are suing Smith & Wesson, the manufacturer of the M&P 15 rifle used in the attack, alleging deceptive marketing practices violated Illinois consumer protection laws and made them responsible for the shooting.

What is the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)?

PLCAA is a federal law that generally prevents individuals from suing gun manufacturers or dealers for criminal misuse of their products, as long as the companies have not broken any laws in their manufacturing or sale.

How are lawsuits trying to get around PLCAA?

Plaintiffs are attempting to circumvent PLCAA by claiming gun manufacturers violated state consumer protection laws through deceptive marketing, arguing this conduct directly led to the criminal act, as seen in previous cases against Remington.

What is the alleged goal of these lawsuits against gun manufacturers?

The alleged goal is not necessarily to win individual cases but to inundate gun companies with numerous, costly legal battles, forcing them into bankruptcy or settlement, thereby achieving gun control through economic means.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →