IL Assault Weapons Ban BLOCKED

Published on April 29, 2023
Duration: 3:51

A federal judge has blocked Illinois's assault weapons and magazine ban, citing that the laws appear to be written in spite of, not conformity with, the directives in Bruin and Heller. The ruling also addresses pistol braces, stating that the ban on them interferes with the meaningful exercise of Second Amendment rights, particularly for individuals with disabilities. The judge emphasized that the Second Amendment's purpose is to empower citizens to fight tyranny, not solely for hunting.

Quick Summary

A federal judge has blocked Illinois's assault weapons and magazine ban, ruling they were written in spite of Supreme Court directives like Bruin and Heller. The decision also protects pistol braces, deeming them essential for Second Amendment rights, particularly for those with disabilities, and reinforcing the amendment's purpose to fight tyranny.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Initial Report: IL Gun Law Declined
  2. 00:09GOA & GOF Secure Preliminary Injunction
  3. 00:21Speaker Introduction: Ben Sanderson
  4. 00:31Details of the Lawsuit Victory
  5. 00:57Judge McGlynn's Criticism of the Ban
  6. 01:09Implications for Other States
  7. 01:23Statement from Sam Perez (GOF)
  8. 01:46PICA and Pistol Braces
  9. 02:09DOJ and ATF on Pistol Braces
  10. 02:42Congressional Action: HJ/SJ Resolutions
  11. 02:57Second Amendment: Fighting Tyranny
  12. 03:34Future Breakdown and Support

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the lawsuit against Illinois's assault weapons ban?

Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) secured a preliminary injunction against Illinois's assault weapons ban and magazine ban. This prevents the state from enforcing these laws, marking a significant victory for gun rights advocates.

What did Judge Stephen McGlynn say about the Illinois gun laws?

Judge McGlynn stated that the assault weapons and magazine ban laws in Illinois appeared to be written in spite of, rather than in conformity with, the clear directives from Supreme Court cases like Bruin and Heller, indicating a constitutional issue with the legislation.

How does the ruling affect pistol braces?

The ruling found that the ban on pistol braces, particularly under the Protect Illinois Communities Act, interferes with the meaningful exercise of Second Amendment rights, especially for individuals with disabilities who may need them to operate a firearm.

What is the core purpose of the Second Amendment according to the judge's ruling?

The judge emphasized that the Second Amendment is not solely for hunting but is fundamentally about empowering citizens to fight tyranny. This historical understanding underscores the right's importance in maintaining a check against potential government overreach.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →