Illinois: Federal Appeals Court Tosses State Ban on Carrying Concealed

Published on December 13, 2012
Duration: 13:09

This video discusses a landmark ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that declared Illinois's ban on carrying firearms in public unconstitutional. Legal expert Dave Cobalt explains how the court, specifically Judge P. Frank Easterbrook, interpreted the Second Amendment, referencing Supreme Court precedents like Heller and McDonald. The discussion highlights the court's reasoning that the right to bear arms inherently includes the right to carry them outside the home for self-defense, and that Illinois's complete prohibition lacked a constitutional basis.

Quick Summary

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has declared Illinois's ban on carrying firearms in public unconstitutional, affirming the Second Amendment right to self-defense outside the home. The court found the state's complete prohibition to be 'obviously unconstitutional,' referencing Supreme Court precedents like Heller and McDonald.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction of Dave Cobalt and the Ruling
  2. 00:07Seventh Circuit's Decision on Illinois Gun Ban
  3. 00:25Unconstitutionality of Illinois's Ban
  4. 00:35Comparison with Other Appellate Courts
  5. 00:57Supreme Court Precedents: Heller and McDonald
  6. 01:23Judge P. Frank Easterbrook's Role
  7. 02:00Judge Easterbrook's Past Opinions on Heller
  8. 02:47Role of Judges in Interpreting the Constitution
  9. 03:17Right to Bear Arms and Self-Defense Outside Home
  10. 03:32Meaning of 'Bear Arms'
  11. 03:49Chicago Crime Statistics and Self-Defense
  12. 04:05Potential for New Lawsuits in Illinois
  13. 04:34Critique of 'May Issue' Licensing
  14. 04:55NRA's Role and Legislative Support
  15. 05:30Legislative Majority for 'Shall Issue'
  16. 05:54Combined Arms Strategy: Lawsuits and Legislation
  17. 06:45Key Points from the Court Opinion
  18. 06:57Dave Cobalt's Articles Cited by Court
  19. 07:23Dissent's Citation of Cobalt's Work
  20. 08:51Majority's Citation of Cobalt's Work
  21. 09:45Pure Case vs. Theoretical Right
  22. 09:55Speculation on State's Appeal Strategy
  23. 10:26District of Columbia v. Heller Analogy
  24. 11:31Urging Defense of Illinois Law
  25. 11:46Future of Right-to-Carry Cases
  26. 12:00Hope for Supreme Court Review
  27. 12:24Supreme Court Justices' Ages and Priorities
  28. 13:00Conclusion and Congratulations

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on Illinois's firearm ban?

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Illinois's ban on carrying firearms in public, whether concealed or openly, is unconstitutional. The court found that the state's complete prohibition on carrying firearms outside the home for self-defense violates the Second Amendment.

How did the court interpret the Second Amendment in relation to carrying firearms in public?

The court interpreted the Second Amendment to include the fundamental right to carry firearms outside the home for self-defense. This interpretation was based on Supreme Court precedents like Heller and McDonald, which discussed the right to bear arms and its implications for public carry.

Why is the Illinois ruling considered significant compared to other appellate court decisions?

This ruling is significant because the Seventh Circuit explicitly stated that Illinois's ban was 'obviously unconstitutional' and 'not even a close case.' This contrasts with some other appellate courts that have taken a more restrictive view on the right to carry firearms in public.

What are the potential next steps for the Illinois Attorney General regarding this ruling?

There is speculation that the Illinois Attorney General might not appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. Instead, they might seek an 'en banc' review by the Seventh Circuit or allow the decision to stand, possibly to avoid a definitive Supreme Court ruling that could impact gun rights nationwide.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →