JUST TODAY: Gun Control Forces LAUNCH ALL OUT ASSAULT ON Suppressor Removal from NFA... It's The HPA

Published on June 13, 2025
Duration: 16:49

This video discusses the ongoing legislative battle surrounding the Hearing Protection Act (HPA) and the efforts by gun control organizations to prevent suppressors from being removed from the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker, Braden from Langley Outdoors Academy, analyzes statements from senators like Chuck Schumer, Mark Kelly, and Chris Murphy, refuting their claims about suppressors being primarily designed for crime and arguing against the necessity of rigorous background checks for their purchase. The video highlights the role of advocacy groups like Giffords.org and Moms Demand Action in opposing the HPA and urges viewers to contact their senators.

Quick Summary

The Hearing Protection Act (HPA) aims to remove firearm suppressors from the National Firearms Act (NFA), making them more accessible. However, gun control groups and some senators oppose this, arguing suppressors are primarily used for crime and that their removal would create loopholes, while proponents see them as essential hearing protection devices.

Chapters

  1. 00:05Introduction and Show Overview
  2. 00:27Gun Controllers vs. Hearing Protection Act (HPA)
  3. 01:34Senator Chuck Schumer's Stance on Suppressors
  4. 02:05The Senate Reconciliation 'Bird Rule'
  5. 03:51Schumer's 'Bird Rule' Argument Explained
  6. 05:00Senator Mark Kelly's Claims on Suppressors
  7. 06:26Unknown Senator's Arguments on Suppressors
  8. 07:33Giffords.org Talking Points and Polls
  9. 08:31Senator Chris Murphy's Views on Suppressors
  10. 09:02Murphy: Suppressors Designed for Crime?
  11. 10:14Current NFA Process for Silencers
  12. 11:14Murphy on Criminal Market and Gun Industry
  13. 13:16Critique of Senator Murphy's Rhetoric
  14. 13:34Revisiting Chuck Schumer's Points
  15. 14:02Impact of Suppressor Removal on Gun Owners
  16. 15:10Schumer's Dislike of Freedom
  17. 16:08Senators' Fear and Coordinated Opposition
  18. 16:24Call to Action: Contact Your Senators

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Hearing Protection Act (HPA)?

The Hearing Protection Act (HPA) is a legislative proposal aimed at removing firearm suppressors (silencers) from the regulations imposed by the National Firearms Act (NFA). The goal is to make suppressors more accessible and affordable for law-abiding citizens by treating them like any other firearm accessory.

Why are gun control groups opposing the Hearing Protection Act?

Gun control organizations like Giffords.org, Everytown for Gun Safety, and Moms Demand Action oppose the HPA, arguing that suppressors are primarily used for criminal activity and that their removal from the NFA would create dangerous loopholes. They advocate for maintaining or strengthening regulations on suppressors.

What is the 'Bird Rule' in the Senate, and how does it relate to suppressor legislation?

The 'Bird Rule' is a Senate procedure that can be used to strike provisions from reconciliation bills if they are not germane to the bill's primary purpose, particularly if they don't relate to raising or cutting taxes. Opponents of the HPA are attempting to use this rule to eliminate the suppressor deregulation provisions.

What are the main arguments made by senators against suppressor removal?

Senators opposing suppressor removal often claim they are primarily designed for crime, that their removal would bypass necessary background checks, and that they are a tool for criminals. They also cite statistics from advocacy groups to support their claims about public opinion.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →