Justices were dropping BOMBS FROM ORBIT today on the DOJ lawyer… Some of these exchanges are CRINGE
This video analyzes key exchanges from the Rahimi case Supreme Court arguments, focusing on how justices questioned the government's representative regarding the basis for restricting firearm rights. The discussion highlights concerns about subjective standards like 'responsibility' versus objective 'dangerousness,' the potential for executive overreach in firearm regulation, and historical interpretations of Second Amendment protections.










