Leftist Media Turns On Gun Controllers… They Are OPENLY USING RACISM…

Published on February 7, 2024
Duration: 9:16

This video discusses how the leftist media, specifically the LA Times, has called out leftist gun controllers for using historically racist laws to justify modern gun control measures. The content highlights the legal challenge presented by the Bruen decision, which requires gun laws to be deeply rooted in American history and tradition. California's attempt to defend ammunition background check laws by citing historical precedents, many of which were discriminatory, is critically examined.

Quick Summary

The LA Times has highlighted how leftist gun controllers are using historically racist laws to justify modern gun control, a strategy now under scrutiny due to the US Supreme Court's Bruen decision. This ruling requires gun laws to have deep historical roots, forcing a re-examination of past legislation, many of which were discriminatory.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Leftist Media Turns on Gun Controllers
  2. 00:47Sponsor Spotlight: Ground News
  3. 01:59Historical Context of Gun Control Laws
  4. 02:32LA Times Report on California's Legal Defense
  5. 03:59The Caveat: Racism in Historical Gun Laws
  6. 05:03ATF's Use of Discriminatory Laws
  7. 05:35Judge Benitez Rebukes State's Reliance on Racist Laws
  8. 06:39Judge Benitez's Strong Statement on Tyranny
  9. 07:15LA Times Criticizes Racism in Gun Control Arguments
  10. 07:38UCLA Professor on Racist Gun Laws
  11. 08:16The Quandary for Liberal States
  12. 08:50Conclusion: Openly Admitting the Problem

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the LA Times criticizing gun controllers?

The LA Times is criticizing gun controllers because they are using historically racist laws to justify modern gun control measures, a tactic that has been exposed as problematic and hypocritical, especially in light of the Bruen decision's historical standard.

What is the significance of the Bruen decision for gun control laws?

The Bruen decision requires that gun control measures be deeply rooted in American history and tradition or be similar to centuries-old laws. This has forced proponents of gun control to examine historical precedents, inadvertently uncovering discriminatory laws.

How did California attempt to defend its ammunition background check laws?

California's attorneys attempted to defend ammunition background check laws by citing historical laws that limited firearm and ammunition access. However, many of these historical laws were found to be explicitly racist, restricting rights for minority groups.

What was Judge Roger T. Benitez's ruling on California's ammunition background check laws?

US District Judge Roger T. Benitez ruled that California's ammunition background check laws were unconstitutional. He rebuked the state for relying on racist historical laws and stated that such repugnant examples of prejudice cannot be used to justify current infringements on constitutional rights.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →