[Legal Discussion] The Fresno OIS

Published on December 27, 2019
Duration: 13:55

This video features a legal analysis of a police shooting incident involving a fleeing suspect. A board-certified attorney discusses the legal standards for using deadly force against fleeing individuals, referencing key Supreme Court cases like Tennessee v. Garner and Graham v. Connor. The analysis highlights the importance of the officer's perspective versus the legal standard, the potential impact of the environment (like a daycare), and the concept of a reasonable mistake of fact. The discussion also touches upon the differing standards between law enforcement officers and private citizens when confronting fleeing suspects.

Quick Summary

The legal standards for using deadly force against fleeing suspects, established by cases like Tennessee v. Garner, require an imminent threat to the officer or community. Graham v. Connor's objective reasonableness standard also applies. Environmental factors like a daycare and the concept of a reasonable mistake of fact are crucial in legal analysis.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Legal Expert
  2. 01:20Incident Footage and Initial Analysis
  3. 02:37The Fatal Shot and Aftermath
  4. 03:30Attorney's Initial Thoughts
  5. 04:09Furtive Gesture and Officer's Perspective
  6. 04:48Legal Standards for Fleeing Suspects
  7. 06:02Criminal vs. Legal Perspective
  8. 06:37Officer's Split-Second Decision
  9. 07:17Public Perception and Bias Concerns
  10. 08:03Advice for Individuals Detained
  11. 09:11Officer vs. Private Citizen Use of Force Standards
  12. 10:38Duty to Pursue and Immunity
  13. 11:09Cultural Wrestling with Use of Force
  14. 11:47Mistake of Fact and Legal Ramifications
  15. 13:05Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

What legal standards govern the use of deadly force against a fleeing suspect?

The use of deadly force against a fleeing suspect is governed by standards like Tennessee v. Garner, requiring an imminent threat to the officer or community. Graham v. Connor's objective reasonableness standard also applies, considering the totality of the circumstances from a reasonable officer's perspective.

How does the environment, like a daycare, affect the legal analysis of a police shooting?

A daycare environment can significantly impact the legal analysis by increasing the perceived threat to the community. Officers must consider the potential presence of children and the overall safety of the area when making use-of-force decisions.

Can a reasonable mistake of fact be a defense in a use-of-force case?

Yes, a reasonable mistake of fact can be a defense if an individual, including a law enforcement officer, acts based on a mistaken belief about the circumstances, provided that belief was objectively reasonable given the information available at the time.

What is the difference between a law enforcement officer's and a private citizen's duty when confronting a fleeing suspect?

Law enforcement officers have a duty to pursue and apprehend fleeing suspects, which can influence the legal justification for their actions. Private citizens generally do not have this duty and may be held to a different standard if they choose to intervene.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Active Self Protection

View all →