Mayor Says If You Own A Gun, You Should Be Ashamed Of Yourself

Published on February 25, 2026
Duration: 6:54

Colion Noir critically analyzes Grand Rapids Mayor David LaGrand's statement that gun owners should be ashamed. Noir argues that the Mayor's position is hypocritical and misrepresents the purpose of firearms, which are primarily for self-defense. He emphasizes that law-abiding citizens exercising their right to protect themselves and their families should not be shamed, contrasting this with the Mayor's reliance on armed security.

Quick Summary

Colion Noir refutes Mayor David LaGrand's claim that gun owners should be ashamed. Noir argues that the primary purpose of firearms is self-defense, a legitimate need for protecting oneself and family, unlike non-beneficial activities like smoking. He criticizes the Mayor's hypocrisy and the ineffectiveness of shaming law-abiding citizens.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Mayor's Statement on Gun Ownership
  2. 00:13Mayor's Argument Against Guns
  3. 00:57Colion Noir's Rebuttal to Mayor
  4. 01:47Shaming Law-Abiding Citizens
  5. 02:53Purpose of Gun Ownership
  6. 03:10Refuting Cigarette Comparison
  7. 03:30Politician's Hypocrisy on Guns
  8. 03:49Pathetic Reliance on Others
  9. 04:31Projection and Infantilization
  10. 05:17Mayor's Credibility on Risk
  11. 05:27Defensive Gun Use Statistics
  12. 05:50Conclusion: Moral Superiority vs. Leadership
  13. 06:13Merchandise and Channel Promotion

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Mayor David LaGrand say gun owners should be ashamed?

Mayor David LaGrand of Grand Rapids, Michigan, stated that gun owners should be ashamed because he believes guns are solely for killing human beings and have no other practical purpose. He suggested that the community should shame gun possession, drawing a parallel to smoking.

What is Colion Noir's main argument against the Mayor's statement?

Colion Noir argues that those who rely on others for protection in violent situations should be ashamed, not law-abiding gun owners. He criticizes the Mayor's 'La La Land' perspective and highlights the hypocrisy of telling citizens they should be ashamed for wanting to protect themselves.

How does Colion Noir refute the Mayor's comparison of guns to items like tires or cigarettes?

Noir explains that guns are for self-defense in life-threatening situations, a critical function unlike gardening tools or tire irons. He debunks the cigarette comparison by stating that smoking offers no benefit, whereas a firearm provides substantial benefits for personal and family protection.

What does Colion Noir say about the effectiveness of shaming gun owners?

Noir asserts that shaming only impacts law-abiding individuals, not criminals. He points out that even prison doesn't deter criminals, so shaming is unlikely to be effective. He believes the Mayor is shaming people who are exercising their right to self-protection.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →