Proof Facebook Fact-Checkers Are Censoring Debates On Constitutional Rights Like the 2nd Amendment

Published on March 17, 2021
Duration: 19:37

This video critically examines Facebook's fact-checking process, specifically concerning a Politifact article that flagged content by Colion Noir regarding universal background checks. Noir argues that Politifact, through its reporter Tom Kirschner, misrepresented his stance and engaged in doxxing by using his real name. The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation of polls related to universal background checks, with Noir contending that the polls were misleading due to vague wording and small sample sizes, and that support would significantly decrease if the implications, such as a national gun registry, were clearly understood. He asserts that this fact-checking process is a form of censorship designed to suppress voices advocating for Second Amendment rights.

Quick Summary

Colion Noir argues that polls claiming 90% support for universal background checks are misleading because they don't clarify the definition or implications, such as a national gun registry. He suggests that if the public fully understood these aspects, support would be significantly lower, and criticizes fact-checkers for potentially censoring Second Amendment discussions on platforms like Facebook.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: The HR 8 Debate
  2. 00:56Politifact Fact-Check Request
  3. 01:40Politifact Article and Facebook Flagging
  4. 02:15Critique of Politifact's Article as a 'Hit Piece'
  5. 03:14Investigating Politifact Reporter's Bias
  6. 04:14Allegations of Doxxing and Out-of-Context Statements
  7. 05:09Parkland Statement Controversy
  8. 06:17Full Context of Parkland Statement
  9. 07:11Fact-Checker's Role in Doxxing
  10. 07:44Analyzing Politifact's Core Arguments
  11. 08:12The Need for a Gun Registry
  12. 10:01Polls vs. Specificity on Universal Background Checks
  13. 10:38Using Giffords Law Center Data
  14. 11:17Contradicting Polls with Ballot Initiatives
  15. 13:12Critique of Poll Sample Sizes and Wording
  16. 14:04Boston University Study on UBC Support
  17. 14:33State-Level Ballot Initiative Results
  18. 15:17Combining State Initiative Data
  19. 15:53Straw Man Argument and Lack of Information
  20. 16:20Deceitful Use of Polls Over Initiatives
  21. 16:36Purpose: Smear and Destroy Credibility
  22. 17:06Politifact-Facebook Partnership Impact
  23. 17:24Facebook as a Platform for Dialogue
  24. 18:09Call for Intellectual Honesty
  25. 18:24Fact-Checkers as Bullies
  26. 18:52Culture War Against the Second Amendment
  27. 19:14Merchandise and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument against the 90% support for universal background checks?

The speaker argues that polls claiming 90% support for universal background checks are misleading. They contend that the polls use vague language, don't explain the difference from existing background checks, and fail to mention implications like a national gun registry, which would likely lower public support if understood.

How does Colion Noir accuse Politifact of bias?

Colion Noir accuses Politifact reporter Tom Kirschner of bias by pointing to Kirschner's history of anti-gun tweets and the extremely short deadline given for a response to his fact-check request. Noir suggests this indicates the article was pre-written and intended to discredit him rather than objectively verify facts.

What is the alleged impact of Facebook's fact-checking on Second Amendment discussions?

Facebook's partnership with fact-checkers like Politifact can lead to censorship by flagging videos as false. This results in disclaimers, reduced reach, and potential account bans, which the speaker believes stifles open dialogue and the exchange of ideas on crucial constitutional rights like the Second Amendment.

Why does the speaker believe universal background checks require a national gun registry?

The speaker asserts that to effectively enforce universal background checks, which apply to all firearm transfers, a national registry is necessary to track ownership. Without it, enforcement becomes difficult, and public support might decrease if this requirement were clearly communicated.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →