Ruger to Discontinue/Modify RXM? (Since Glock Caved to Cali)

Published on November 12, 2025
Duration: 10:38

The video discusses the lawsuit against Ruger to discontinue the RXM, drawing parallels to Glock's recent design changes in response to California's ban on the cruciform trigger system. The speaker argues that Ruger has less motivation to alter the RXM than Glock did, as the RXM is a newer, less significant part of Ruger's catalog and was not approved for sale in California anyway. This stance positions the RXM as a potential beneficiary, attracting consumers who prefer the older Glock trigger system.

Quick Summary

Anti-gun groups are suing Ruger to discontinue the RXM model, mirroring Glock's recent design changes to comply with California's ban on the cruciform trigger system. The speaker argues Ruger has less incentive to modify the RXM, as it was not sold in California and is a minor product, potentially allowing Ruger to gain market share from consumers preferring the older trigger design.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: Anti-gun groups target Ruger RXM
  2. 00:27Glock's Design Changes Explained
  3. 00:56California's Ban on Cruciform Trigger
  4. 01:23Glock's Strategic Move: Not Caving
  5. 02:18Lawsuit Against Ruger RXM
  6. 02:54Ruger vs. Glock: Different Business Models
  7. 03:40RXM's Place in Ruger's Catalog
  8. 04:19RXM as a Glock Gen 3 Clone
  9. 05:04Potential Benefits for Ruger
  10. 06:16Boosting RXM Sales
  11. 07:29Ruger's Lack of California Market Problem
  12. 08:01Recommendation: Keep RXM Design
  13. 08:55Call to Action & Channel Support

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are anti-gun groups suing Ruger?

Anti-gun groups are suing Ruger to discontinue their RXM model. This action follows Glock's recent design modifications to its firearms in response to California's ban on the cruciform trigger system, which was cited as a safety concern.

What changes did Glock make to its firearms?

Glock transitioned to its Gen 5 models, replacing the cruciform trigger bar system with a performance center trigger system. This change was made to comply with California's law that outlawed the cruciform trigger, which was deemed by the state to facilitate conversion to fully automatic fire.

Does the California law banning the cruciform trigger affect Ruger's RXM?

The California law banning the cruciform trigger system does not directly affect Ruger's RXM sales because the RXM was not approved for sale in California to begin with. This significantly reduces Ruger's motivation to alter the firearm's design.

Could Ruger benefit from Glock's design changes?

Yes, Ruger could potentially benefit. By keeping the RXM's design, which is similar to older Glock models, Ruger can attract consumers who prefer that system and may be dissatisfied with Glock's newer designs. This could lead to increased RXM sales.

Should Ruger modify the RXM to comply with potential future laws?

The speaker advises against it. Since Ruger wasn't selling the RXM in California anyway and it's not a major part of their sales, they have little to lose by keeping the current design. They stand to gain market share from consumers seeking the older trigger system.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →