SCOTUS Plantiff Robert Nash on Cam & Co. // October 8, 2021

Published on October 8, 2021
Duration: 2:06

This video features Robert Nash, a plaintiff in the Supreme Court case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. Nash discusses his personal experience navigating New York's restrictive pistol permit laws, which initially limited his permit to hunting and target shooting. He highlights the lengthy process and the arbitrary nature of permit denials, motivating his involvement in the legal challenge to these regulations.

Quick Summary

Robert Nash, a plaintiff in the Supreme Court case NYSRPA v. Bruen, discusses his personal struggle with New York's restrictive pistol permit laws. He highlights the 'red tape,' lengthy waits, and arbitrary restrictions, such as limiting permits to hunting and target shooting, which he believes violate the Second Amendment.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to NRA Contact
  2. 00:07Supreme Court Case: NYSRPA v. Bruen
  3. 00:15Introducing Plaintiff Robert Nash
  4. 00:20Growing Up in New York State
  5. 00:25New York Red Tape for Permits
  6. 00:35Pistol Permit Issued with Restrictions
  7. 00:46Plan for Concealed Carry
  8. 00:54Assigned Judge and Permit Denials
  9. 01:03Challenging the Law's Validity
  10. 01:07Membership in NYSRPA
  11. 01:12Contacting NYSRPA
  12. 01:15Email from Tom King
  13. 01:23Consultation with NRA
  14. 01:30Belief in a Strong Case
  15. 01:32Goal: Fix New York State's Law
  16. 01:38Second Amendment Violation
  17. 01:42Ordinary Citizens Can Make a Difference
  18. 01:47Fighting for What's Right
  19. 01:57Going to the Supreme Court
  20. 02:03Final Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the Supreme Court case New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen?

The case, which had oral arguments on November 3rd, challenges New York's restrictive pistol permit laws. Plaintiff Robert Nash discusses his experience with these laws, which initially limited his permit to hunting and target shooting, highlighting the legal fight for Second Amendment rights.

What challenges did Robert Nash face in obtaining a pistol permit in New York?

Robert Nash, a plaintiff in NYSRPA v. Bruen, faced significant 'red tape' and lengthy delays, waiting four to five months for a permit. Even after approval, his permit was restricted to hunting and target shooting, preventing concealed carry, which he felt was unjust.

How did the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association get involved with Robert Nash's case?

After experiencing restrictive pistol permit limitations, Robert Nash contacted the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association. An email response from Tom King indicated awareness of similar issues and led to consultation with the NRA, ultimately forming the basis for the Supreme Court case.

What is the core legal argument in the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen case?

The core argument, as articulated by plaintiff Robert Nash, is that New York's 'proper cause' requirement for pistol permits violates the Second Amendment. The case aims to address the restrictive nature of these laws and ensure citizens' rights are upheld.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →