Sig Sauer Addresses Canadian Special Forces Claim

Published on February 6, 2021
Duration: 6:31

This video discusses Sig Sauer's official statement addressing claims of unintended discharges with the P320 pistol by Canadian Special Forces. Sig Sauer attributes the incident to the use of an incorrect, modified P226 holster, suggesting the timing of the report is an attempt to influence military procurement tenders. The company asserts the P320 meets rigorous safety standards.

Quick Summary

Sig Sauer stated that an unintended discharge involving a P320 with Canadian Special Forces was caused by the use of a modified P226 holster. They believe the timing of the media report was an attempt to influence military procurement tenders, asserting the P320 meets rigorous safety standards.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Canadian Military Claims
  2. 00:20Guns & Gadgets Welcome & Sponsor
  3. 00:49Report of P320 Incident in Canada
  4. 01:14Summary of Previous P320 Claims
  5. 01:49Sig Sauer's Official Statement
  6. 02:00Sig Sauer Working with Canadian Forces
  7. 02:08Inaccurate Canadian Media Report
  8. 02:18Incident Date and Media Timing
  9. 02:26Competitor Influence and Tender Timing
  10. 02:42Firearm Testing and Safety Determination
  11. 02:47Cause: Incorrect Holster Use
  12. 03:04P320 Rigorous Vetting and Standards
  13. 03:32P320 U.S. Military Adoption (M17/M18)
  14. 03:46Sig Sauer's Response Analysis
  15. 03:54Digging Deeper: Procurement Motives
  16. 04:15Interesting Timing of Investigation
  17. 04:32Square Peg in a Round Hole Analogy
  18. 04:43P320 Claims: Hate or User Error?
  19. 05:07Desire for Investigation Clarity
  20. 05:13Sig Sauer Defends Honor
  21. 05:32Shame on Canadian Military?
  22. 05:36Conclusion: Ongoing Issue
  23. 05:41Call to Action: Subscribe
  24. 06:00Sign Off and Safety Reminder

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Sig Sauer state regarding the Canadian P320 incident?

Sig Sauer stated they are working with Canadian Special Operations Forces Command to resolve an unintended discharge incident involving a P320. They attributed the incident to the use of an incorrect, modified P226 holster and suggested the timing of the media report was an attempt to influence military procurement tenders.

What was the alleged cause of the P320 unintended discharge in Canada?

According to Sig Sauer's statement, the unintended discharge was caused by the use of a modified P226 holster, which was not designed for the P320. This created an unsafe condition by allowing a foreign object to enter the holster.

Why does Sig Sauer believe the timing of the P320 incident report is suspicious?

Sig Sauer suggested that the release of the inaccurate and incomplete report coincided with the immediate release of other Canadian military and law enforcement tenders. They believe this timing indicates an attempt to improperly influence these procurement processes.

How does Sig Sauer defend the safety of the P320 pistol?

Sig Sauer asserts that the P320 is among the most rigorously vetted pistols on the market, meeting and exceeding all U.S. safety standards and global military and law enforcement protocols, including those set by ANSI, NIJ, and the DOJ. It is also the pistol of choice for all branches of the U.S. military.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →