Stinchfield | Dana Loesch: Hypocrisy of the Women's March Against the NRA - 7/17/17

Published on July 18, 2017
Duration: 10:13

This video critiques the Women's March Against the NRA, highlighting perceived hypocrisy among its leaders and organizers. Speakers Dana Loesch and Grant Stinchfield argue that the march's leaders exhibit sexism, antisemitism, and class warfare, while simultaneously benefiting from rights and security measures that the NRA advocates for. The discussion emphasizes the hypocrisy of advocating for gun control while employing armed security and criticizes associations with figures promoting oppressive ideologies.

Quick Summary

The Women's March Against the NRA is criticized for hypocrisy, particularly regarding sexism and the use of armed security. Speakers Dana Loesch and Grant Stinchfield argue that organizers exhibit class warfare by hiring private security while opposing civilian gun rights, and that associations with figures like Louis Farrakhan are problematic.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro
  2. 00:07NRA TV with Grant Stinchfield
  3. 00:14Hypocrisy of Women's March Against NRA
  4. 00:32Pastor's Sexist Comments on Dana Loesch
  5. 01:31Dana Loesch Responds to Sexism
  6. 02:31Women are the NRA
  7. 02:50Firearms as Equalizer for Women
  8. 03:12Criticism of Linda Sarsour and Sharia Law
  9. 04:12Rabbi and Louis Farrakhan Controversy
  10. 04:44Farrakhan's Antisemitic Views
  11. 05:03Women's Gun Ownership and Shooting Sports
  12. 05:33Moms Demand Action and Disarming Minority Males
  13. 06:17Protestors Use Armed Security
  14. 06:35Hypocrisy of Armed Security Use
  15. 07:35Class Warfare and Wealthy Progressives
  16. 07:54Armed Security Proves Need for Firearms
  17. 08:26NRA Fights for Free Speech
  18. 08:36Ad Controversy and Truth
  19. 09:09Upcoming Ad Targeting Washington Post
  20. 09:25Dana Loesch's Final Remarks
  21. 09:39Grant Stinchfield's Closing Remarks
  22. 09:47Upcoming Guests and Segments
  23. 09:58Outro

Frequently Asked Questions

What hypocrisy is highlighted regarding the Women's March Against the NRA?

The video highlights hypocrisy by pointing out that Women's March organizers, who claim the NRA is sexist and violent, employ paid armed security for their protests. This is seen as hypocritical because the NRA advocates for civilian gun rights, which the marchers seem to benefit from while opposing the organization.

How is sexism addressed in the context of the Women's March Against the NRA?

Sexism is addressed through criticism of a pastor's comment that Dana Loesch is just a 'pretty face' selling guns, dismissing her intelligence. The video also criticizes Linda Sarsour's association with Sharia law, described as a system that severely limits women's rights, labeling it as deeply sexist.

What is the argument against the Women's March leaders' stance on gun control?

The argument is that the leaders of the Women's March exhibit class warfare by hiring private armed security, a service most Americans cannot afford. This is contrasted with the NRA's fight to empower all civilians with the right to self-defense through firearm ownership.

What specific criticisms are made against organizations associated with the Women's March?

Criticisms include the association with Louis Farrakhan, described as an antisemitic figure, and Moms Demand Action, accused of advocating for the disarming of minority males. These associations are presented as enabling the very issues the march claims to oppose.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →