The ATF Wants to BAN ALL Rate Increasing Devices!

Published on January 22, 2018
Duration: 6:34

This video discusses a pending ATF regulation aimed at banning "rate increasing devices" for firearms, potentially impacting accessories like bump stocks and binary triggers. The speaker expresses concerns about the broad definition of such devices, the lack of a clear standard for rate of fire on semi-automatic weapons, and the ATF's authority to create policy without legislative action. It encourages viewers to research the issue and submit comments to the ATF before the deadline, emphasizing respectful and logical feedback.

Quick Summary

The ATF is proposing a ban on 'rate increasing devices' for firearms, which could affect accessories like bump stocks and binary triggers. Concerns include the broad definition of these devices, the lack of clear standards for semi-automatic fire rates, and the ATF creating policy without legislative input, raising fears of a 'slippery slope' for gun rights.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Video Purpose
  2. 00:12Pending ATF Regulation on Rate Increasing Devices
  3. 00:35Targeted Devices: Bump Stocks and Binary Triggers
  4. 01:12Concerns about Broad Definition of 'Rate Increasing Devices'
  5. 01:43Defining Rate of Fire on Semi-Automatic Weapons
  6. 02:23ATF's Authority to Create Policy vs. Legislative Action
  7. 03:08Concerns about ATF's Role and Executive Branch Power
  8. 04:03The Slippery Slope Argument
  9. 04:27How to Submit Comments to the ATF
  10. 04:36Gun Owners of America (GOA) Resource
  11. 04:53Guidelines for Respectful Comments
  12. 06:04Call to Action: Stand Up for Rights

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ATF proposing to ban regarding firearms?

The ATF is considering a new regulation that aims to ban any firearm accessory classified as a 'rate increasing device.' This is primarily targeting items like bump stocks and binary or echo triggers, following past incidents.

Why is the ATF's proposed ban on rate increasing devices controversial?

The controversy stems from the broad definition of 'rate increasing device,' the lack of a clear standard for semi-automatic fire rates, and the ATF creating policy without direct legislative action from Congress, raising concerns about executive overreach.

How can individuals voice their opinion on the ATF's proposed ban?

Individuals can submit comments directly to the ATF. Organizations like Gun Owners of America (GOA) provide resources and links to make this process easier, urging viewers to submit respectful and logical feedback before the comment period closes.

What are the potential long-term implications of the ATF creating policy without Congress?

Critics argue that allowing the ATF to enact regulations without legislative approval sets a dangerous precedent. This 'slippery slope' could lead to further restrictions on firearm ownership, especially if future ATF leadership holds anti-gun stances.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from 4MR Ranch

View all →