The Chaos in the 9th Circus (uh, Circuit)

Published on October 11, 2023
Duration: 8:57

This video analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision to stay Judge Benitez's order in Duncan v. Bonta, criticizing the court's procedural actions and perceived disregard for Supreme Court precedent like the Bruen decision. It highlights dissenting opinions from Judges Nelson and Bonta, who argue the Ninth Circuit is undermining public confidence and treating the Second Amendment as inferior to other constitutional rights. The discussion also touches on potential avenues for emergency review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Quick Summary

The Ninth Circuit's handling of Duncan v. Bonta is criticized for procedural irregularities and disregard for the Bruen decision's mandate for historical analysis. Dissenting judges argue the court shows disdain for Second Amendment rights, and a petition for emergency review to the U.S. Supreme Court is a likely next step.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Ninth Circuit Shenanigans
  2. 01:04Duncan v. Bonta Case Overview
  3. 02:00Judge Nelson's Dissenting Opinion
  4. 03:27Judge Bonta's Sharp Dissent
  5. 04:30Critique of Ninth Circuit's Analysis
  6. 05:33Irreparable Harm Argument
  7. 06:09Disdain for Second Amendment
  8. 07:02Gamesmanship and Next Steps
  9. 07:18Supreme Court Review Possibilities
  10. 08:06Conclusion & Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Duncan v. Bonta case about and why is the Ninth Circuit's handling of it controversial?

The Duncan v. Bonta case challenges California's firearm regulations. The Ninth Circuit's handling is controversial due to its decision to grant an en banc review and issue a stay, bypassing standard appellate procedures and allegedly disregarding Supreme Court precedent like the Bruen decision.

What are the main criticisms from the dissenting judges in the Ninth Circuit's Duncan v. Bonta ruling?

Dissenting judges criticize the Ninth Circuit for procedural irregularities, previously being sanctioned by the Supreme Court for similar actions, and for failing to adhere to the historical analysis required by Bruen. They also argue the court shows disdain for the Second Amendment.

How might the Duncan v. Bonta case proceed after the Ninth Circuit's stay order?

Given the controversy and alleged disregard for precedent, there's a strong possibility of a petition for emergency review to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the assigned Justice denies review, petitioners can seek review from any other Supreme Court Justice.

What is the significance of the Bruen decision in the context of the Ninth Circuit's ruling?

The Bruen decision mandates that firearm regulations must be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. Critics argue the Ninth Circuit in Duncan v. Bonta failed to apply this standard, instead relying on weaker justifications and non-binding decisions.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →