The Depths That Government Will Go to Keep You Disarmed

Published on February 14, 2024
Duration: 9:05

This video analyzes the legal arguments presented in Worth v. Jacobson, a challenge to Minnesota's statute prohibiting 18-20 year olds from obtaining a firearm license. The core of the discussion revolves around the interpretation of 'the people' in the Second Amendment, particularly in light of the 26th Amendment, which grants voting rights to 18-20 year olds. The presenter highlights the government's argument that this age group is not historically included in the Second Amendment's protections, despite their status as citizens and voters.

Quick Summary

The case Worth v. Jacobson challenges Minnesota Statute 624.714, which prevents 18-20 year olds from getting a firearm license. The government argues that historical interpretations of the Second Amendment's 'the people' do not include this age group, despite the 26th Amendment granting them voting rights and full citizenship.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Govt's Disarmament Tactics
  2. 01:12The Case: Worth v. Jacobson
  3. 01:20Minnesota Statute 624.714 Explained
  4. 02:05Historical Context of Young People Arming Themselves
  5. 03:14Solicitor General Liz Kramer's Argument
  6. 04:06Role of the 26th Amendment
  7. 05:05Critique of Government's Legal Position
  8. 06:06Text of the 26th Amendment
  9. 07:1326th Amendment Ratification and Context
  10. 07:21Bruen Test vs. 26th Amendment Interpretation
  11. 08:00Conclusion: Govt's Efforts to Disarm

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Minnesota Statute 624.714 and why is it being challenged?

Minnesota Statute 624.714 prohibits individuals between the ages of 18 and 20 from obtaining a license to carry a firearm. This statute is being challenged in the case of Worth v. Jacobson, which argues that this restriction infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of young adults.

How does the 26th Amendment relate to the Second Amendment in the Worth v. Jacobson case?

The 26th Amendment grants citizens 18 and older the right to vote, establishing them as part of the political community. The challenge in Worth v. Jacobson argues that if 18-20 year olds are considered part of the political community for voting, they should also be considered part of 'the people' protected by the Second Amendment.

What is the government's primary legal argument against firearm rights for 18-20 year olds?

The government's argument, as presented by Minnesota's solicitor general, is that historical analysis, particularly under the Bruen test, shows that 18-20 year olds have not traditionally been considered part of 'the people' protected by the Second Amendment, despite their citizenship and voting rights.

When was the 26th Amendment ratified and what was its historical context?

The 26th Amendment was ratified in 1971, making it the fastest amendment to be adopted in U.S. history. Its ratification was largely driven by the Vietnam War, as it addressed the inequity of 18-year-olds being eligible for military conscription and combat but not for voting.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →