The Left is so desperate for Gun Control they are OPENLY embracing Racist History as PRECEDENT...

Published on August 25, 2022
Duration: 8:07

This video discusses the legal arguments made by New York State in defense of its Concealed Carry Improvement Act, specifically the 'good moral character' requirement. The state's defense relies on historical precedents, including laws that disarmed Catholics and indigenous people, which the video argues is a problematic embrace of racist history to justify current gun control measures. The argument highlights a perceived hypocrisy in the left's approach to historical injustices when advocating for gun control.

Quick Summary

New York State is defending its Concealed Carry Improvement Act by citing historically racist laws, such as those disarming Catholics and indigenous people, as precedent for its 'good moral character' requirement. This legal strategy, highlighted by critics, is seen as an attempt to use past injustices to justify current gun control measures following the Bruen decision.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Gun Control and Racist History
  2. 00:17Bruen Decision's Impact on Gun Control
  3. 00:37Left Embracing Racist Practices for Gun Control
  4. 01:08Sponsor: Arms Directory
  5. 02:04Wokeness and Historical Revisionism
  6. 02:38Contradictions in the Woke Agenda
  7. 03:20NY Good Moral Character Law's Racist Roots
  8. 03:35DOJ's Legal Strategy on Gun Control
  9. 03:56NY's Racist Laws as Precedent for CCIA
  10. 04:26Concealed Carry Improvement Act Details
  11. 04:56GOA Lawsuit and State's Defense
  12. 05:37Attorneys' Argument: Anglo-American Tradition
  13. 05:49Historical Disarming of Catholics and Indigenous People
  14. 06:18Quote: Preventing Native American Firearm Ownership
  15. 06:39Source: Washington Examiner Report
  16. 06:52GOA's Perspective and Judge's Questions
  17. 07:12Attorney's Point on Racist Laws Justifying Bans
  18. 07:24Call to Action for Republicans and Lawmakers
  19. 07:58Conclusion and Viewer Engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core argument regarding New York's gun control laws and historical precedent?

The central argument is that New York State, in defending its Concealed Carry Improvement Act's 'good moral character' requirement, is using historically racist laws as precedent. This includes past prohibitions on firearm ownership for Catholics and indigenous people, which critics argue is a hypocritical embrace of past injustices to achieve current gun control goals.

How does the Bruen decision relate to New York's current gun control laws?

The Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen struck down New York's previous 'good reason' clause for concealed carry permits. In response, New York enacted the Concealed Carry Improvement Act, which includes a 'good moral character' requirement, a provision now being challenged in court.

What historical precedents is New York citing to justify its gun control measures?

New York's legal defense points to historical laws that prohibited firearm ownership based on religion or ethnicity. Specifically, they mention laws from the 17th and 18th centuries that disarmed Catholics and prevented the sale of arms to indigenous people, arguing these established traditions for restricting firearm access.

Who is challenging New York's 'good moral character' requirement for concealed carry?

Gun Owners of America (GOA) has filed a lawsuit challenging the 'good moral character' standard in New York's Concealed Carry Improvement Act. The lawsuit argues that this subjective requirement is unconstitutional and that the state's defense relies on problematic historical precedents.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →