The Monumental Challenge to Overturn This Federal Gun Law

This video discusses a major lawsuit filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition against New York State, challenging the designation of Times Square as a 'sensitive place' and thus a government-mandated gun-free zone. The lawsuit argues that this designation violates the Second Amendment, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's Bruin decision, which affirmed the right to carry handguns for self-defense outside the home. The core argument is that historical 'sensitive places' had government-provided security, a characteristic absent in Times Square, making the ban an unconstitutional restriction on the right to bear arms.

A new federal lawsuit, Goldberg v. James, challenges New York's Times Square gun ban, arguing it violates the Second Amendment. The lawsuit, filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition, contends that Times Square is a public place and that historical tradition does not support such bans. The case could have nationwide implications for 'sensitive place' laws.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the Roberts v. ATF lawsuit, a significant legal challenge to the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker, demonstrating deep knowledge of gun laws and legal processes, explains how the lawsuit leverages Supreme Court precedents like Bruin and Heller to argue that the NFA exceeds Congress's enumerated powers, especially after the removal of the $200 tax on suppressors and other regulated items. The video highlights the strategic venue in Kentucky and the potential impact of this case on the Second Amendment landscape.

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) against the ATF concerning the federal ban on interstate handgun transfers. The DOJ is reportedly requesting that any potential court victory for FPC be narrowly applied only to the plaintiffs and FPC members, rather than a nationwide injunction. The speaker criticizes this approach, arguing that constitutional rights should not be limited to specific plaintiffs in a lawsuit and that such a narrow injunction would deny rights to millions of Americans.

This video discusses a legal challenge against the federal law prohibiting non-residents from taking possession of handguns purchased from an FFL in a state where they are not a resident. The Department of Justice argues this law is constitutional, while plaintiffs contend it burdens the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The discussion also touches on the DOJ's arguments regarding infringement and the historical justification for such regulations, as well as the concept of associational standing.

This WGL AM episode, hosted by William Kirk on March 23, 2026, provides an expert analysis of critical Second Amendment legal and legislative developments in Washington State. It details the implications of HB 1240 (Semi-Automatic Rifle Ban) and SB 5078 (High-Capacity Magazine Ban), discusses a significant federal court case in the 9th Circuit building on the Bruen decision, and urges listeners to contact legislators and support advocacy groups like FPC and GOA.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.