The New Mexico AG Tells the Governor to Pound Sand

Published on September 13, 2023
0

This video provides an in-depth legal analysis of the New Mexico Attorney General's stance against Governor Lujan Grisham's firearm ban. It highlights the AG's refusal to defend the order, citing constitutional protections and misapplication of public health laws. The analysis is delivered with high legal authority, referencing key Supreme Court cases and constitutional principles.

Quick Summary

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez has refused to defend Governor Lujan Grisham's executive order banning firearm carry, arguing it infringes on Second Amendment rights and misapplies public health laws. The AG cited constitutional protections for self-defense and stated the order was not intended for communicable diseases.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to New Mexico Legal Conflict
  2. 00:48Sponsor: Full Send Precision Rifles
  3. 01:48Widespread Opposition to the Executive Order
  4. 03:19Attorney General Raul Torrez's Refusal to Defend
  5. 04:51AG's Legal Critique of the Order
  6. 08:27Constitutional Protections
  7. 10:32Conclusion and Legal Outlook

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the New Mexico Attorney General refuse to defend the Governor's firearm ban?

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez stated his office would not defend Governor Lujan Grisham's executive order banning firearm carry because he believed the order was unconstitutional and misapplied public health laws.

What legal arguments were made against the New Mexico firearm ban?

The Attorney General argued that the ban prevented self-defense in public and improperly used the Public Health Emergency Response Act (PHERA), which is intended for communicable diseases, not gun violence. He also cited Second Amendment protections.

What is the significance of the Attorney General's refusal to defend the order?

The Attorney General's refusal signifies a major legal challenge to the Governor's authority and highlights concerns that the order infringes upon constitutional rights, potentially leading to its swift invalidation by courts.

What constitutional rights are cited in opposition to the firearm ban?

The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the New Mexico Constitution are cited as protecting the right to keep and bear arms for security, defense, and lawful purposes, which the Governor's order allegedly violates.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →